Attention

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not represent our advertisers

Sunday, October 22, 2017

A Comment Worthy Of A Post 10-16-17

Joe I have been giving this subject a lot of thought and I think you should weigh in on it.

Do you think the Fire Chief and the Police Chief of Municipalities such as Salisbury should be elected positions?

If the fire chief and the police chief are both elected by the voters, citizens of Salisbury, then they would be held accountable to the citizens and not lame mayors like Jake Day, Jim Ireton and Barrie Tilghman.

An elected fire chief and police chief will be required by law to have residency in the municipality where they are elected the entire time.

If the fire chief and police chief are elected by the citizens then they have to be a resident of the city at least 1 year prior to filing as a candidate.

If the fire chief and the police chief are elected by the citizens and not the fire fighters or police officers then they would be held accountable to the citizens and not the lame Mayor's and Councils.

The the fire chief and police chief are elected by the citizens in most of Louisiana I just read. Places that allow elected fire and police chiefs allow the candidates to be non certified, but they are required to get their certifications within 2 years.

If the fire chief and police chief are elected they would be held accountable to the tax payers meaning they wouldn't be wasting our hard earned tax dollars on junk like the S.S. Hoppes.

In most places a new mayor and council means new department heads anyway meaning you get a new police chief and fire chief when they are appointed vs. elected.

I can support a resident/citizen elected fire chief and police chief.

24 comments:

Anonymous said...

Not sure when you people are going to learn that it doesn't matter.
The few good old boys will ensure they get what they want.

Anonymous said...

No way! Salisbury has some of the most disinterested, ignorant voters in the United States. Just look at the last three mayors they elected.

Anonymous said...

Can you support tripling the mayor's salary to $75,000 like that group he appointed has recommended?

Anonymous said...

At its meeting today, the Salisbury City Council is going to consider the proposal to raise the mayor's salary to $75,000 per year and provide employee benefits (health insurance, retirement pension, etc.) The meeting begins at 4:30 and should be available then on Pac14 which is available over the internet at http://www.pac14.org/

Anonymous said...

8:34, you beat me to it.

what s/he said.

Any questions?

Anonymous said...

Instead of increasing his salary and giving him benefits they need that money for the crazy expensive 3 year fair he wants and can not afford. As far as electing a Chief in the Fire Department and Police it would not matter. Politicians tell the people what they want to hear to get their votes. The truth does not matter. Just make the other man or woman look bad with made up stories and it usually works locally.

Anonymous said...

Absolutely NOT!! There's nothing like an elected fire chief or police chief to breed corruption and politicize both positions and departments. This is a road that should not be traveled.

Anonymous said...

8:39,

No!

The data that the "Salary Review Committee" presented as support for its recommendation to triple the mayor's salary actually shows that he is being overpaid. It is available at Joe's earlier post here --

https://sbynews.blogspot.com/2017/10/oh-this-you-have-to-see.html (use the link)

or go directly here and scroll down to page 5 --

https://salisbury.md/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/10-16-17-Council-Work-Session-Agenda-Packet.pdf

Anonymous said...

It would forever be a popularity contest and politics would rule.

Anonymous said...

Anonymous said...
Not sure when you people are going to learn that it doesn't matter.
The few good old boys will ensure they get what they want.

October 16, 2017 at 8:32 AM

Oh Bullshit! Rick Hoppes doesn't live in the city limits so he wouldn't be eligible for election as the fire chief meaning he wouldn't be Salisbury's fire chief. It's idiots like you that keep making stupid, moronic comments like this.

Anonymous said...

Anonymous said...
No way! Salisbury has some of the most disinterested, ignorant voters in the United States. Just look at the last three mayors they elected.

October 16, 2017 at 8:34 AM

You just don't get it do you. If we had elections for the fire and police chief then Hoppes and Duncan wouldn't be ruining those 2 departments. No wonder we have a screwed up country with people like this voting.

Anonymous said...

Anonymous said...
8:34, you beat me to it.

what s/he said.

Any questions?

October 16, 2017 at 8:57 AM

Yes you are an ignorant moron.

So with your infinite wisdom you are Ok with the clowns that Ireton and Day appointed??

Anonymous said...

Anonymous Anonymous said...
Absolutely NOT!! There's nothing like an elected fire chief or police chief to breed corruption and politicize both positions and departments. This is a road that should not be traveled.

October 16, 2017 at 9:09 AM

OMG!! Have you had your head under a rock for the last 15 years???

The Salisbury Fire Department and the Salisbury Police Department and their chief ARE CORRUPT!!

Anonymous said...

Anonymous Anonymous said...
Instead of increasing his salary and giving him benefits they need that money for the crazy expensive 3 year fair he wants and can not afford. As far as electing a Chief in the Fire Department and Police it would not matter. Politicians tell the people what they want to hear to get their votes. The truth does not matter. Just make the other man or woman look bad with made up stories and it usually works locally.

October 16, 2017 at 9:00 AM

"As far as electing a Chief in the Fire Department and Police it would not matter."

Duncan and Hoppes would not be corrupting those departments so it does matter. Joe, they get dumber all the time.

Anonymous said...

Anonymous Anonymous said...
8:39,

No!

The data that the "Salary Review Committee" presented as support for its recommendation to triple the mayor's salary actually shows that he is being overpaid. It is available at Joe's earlier post here --

https://sbynews.blogspot.com/2017/10/oh-this-you-have-to-see.html (use the link)

or go directly here and scroll down to page 5 --

https://salisbury.md/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/10-16-17-Council-Work-Session-Agenda-Packet.pdf


October 16, 2017 at 9:53 AM

Apparently you are on the wrong thread. Go somewhere else please.

Anonymous said...

Anonymous said...
It would forever be a popularity contest and politics would rule.

October 16, 2017 at 10:07 AM

Dumb, Dumb, Dumb!!

At least the tax paying citizens would have their say in who their police chief is or who their fire chief is.

Apparently some of you people are way too dumb to think for yourselves meaning you are way too dumb to vote.

You probably don't even waste your time voting.

Anonymous said...

Anonymous said...
It would forever be a popularity contest and politics would rule.

October 16, 2017 at 10:07 AM

We are not talking about volunteer farmin voting for their voluntir far cheef.

Anonymous said...

Can't be done. It is against the law in Maryland to either hold or take the oath of TWO offices in any hierarchy of government legally in this state. If a candidate i.e. Fire or Police chief is appointed then they must take an oath of allegiance to the entity they serve which is NOT one in the same with that of an elected official. Sad yet
necessary. This is an opinion with case law heard by the Md. Court of Special Appeals.

Anonymous said...

Just like with the BOE, the more politicians the better I've always said.

Anonymous said...

10:46 AM Honey if the good old boys have anything to do with it, being a city resident won't be a criteria.

Pathetic fool.

Anonymous said...

10:46 AM - 10:47 AM - 10:49 AM - 10:51 AM - 10:52 AM - 10:53 AM - 10:55 AM

Forget to take your pill this morning??
Obviously not good at accepting criticism of your faulty suggestion.

Anonymous said...

If losers like Jake Day, Jim Ireton and Barrie Tilghman are the ones getting elected then it really doesn't matter if they are elected, appointed or hired you will get garbage.
In fact, it's better that they are NOT elected because then the blame for these issues can be placed on the elected officials for hiring them, not the citizens for electing them. Plus more elected positions just means more campaigning and less work getting done.

Anonymous said...

12:07, what are you talking about? The article does not infer or suggest that the same person hold both titles. It simply asks if those positions should be elected as opposed to appointed. Reading and comprehension go hand in hand.

Anonymous said...

Does anywhere else elect their fire and police chiefs?