Attention

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not represent our advertisers

Thursday, February 02, 2017

Austria bans use of full-face veils in 'public places'

Following in the footsteps of other countries, Austria is set to prohibit the use of Islamic full-face veils in courts, schools and other “public places.”

Chancellor Christian Kern said Monday the new measures approved by a coalition of Social Democrats and the centrist People’s party are an effort of countering the rise of the far-right Freedom Party, which has witnessed a surge in support that resulted in the party’s presidential candidate nearly winning the election in December.

More

14 comments:

Anonymous said...

Which they should i dont go to my bank with a ski mask why are they diff there not

Anonymous said...

Western Europe is slowly waking up to the Muslim menace.

Anonymous said...

As it should dont like it go BACK.

Anonymous said...

i like this little hidden gem

Further measures agreed by Austria's Social Democrats and their conservative People's party partners include electronic tagging of former jihadists and a proposed curb on foreign workers.

Anonymous said...

Good.

Anonymous said...

We should do the same.

Anonymous said...

Pres. Trump, please do this too! Virginia has a mask law, we need a national law on face coverings. This would give the police the right to arrest all of the people that burn and riot that are covered.

Anonymous said...

If these people want to wear the full-face veils, go back to your country that you came from. This type of attire is not acceptable in the United States.

Anonymous said...

Yes lets outlaw religious freedoms that you do not like. Sounds very constitutional to me.

Anonymous said...

joe
did you know the scum liberal millinials burned down the MARTIN LUTHER KING room at berkley last night ? where is the outrage from BLM and sharpton ??

Anonymous said...

When a "religious freedom" is a threat to a nation or a mandate to a gender, imposed by another nation or gender, it isn't freedom, it's oppression.

Anonymous said...

When a "religious freedom" is a threat to a nation or a mandate to a gender, imposed by another nation or gender, it isn't freedom, it's oppression.

Anonymous said...

Elephant man wouldn't like that.

Anonymous said...

100% agree