The Department of Political Justice
Once again, the rule of law exempts the Clintons
Is it worth impairing the reputation of the FBI and the Department of Justice to save Hillary Clinton from a deserved criminal prosecution by playing word games?
What has become of the rule of law — no one is beneath its protections or above its requirements — when the American public can witness a game of political musical chairs orchestrated by Bill Clinton at an airport in a bizarre ruse to remove the criminal investigation of his wife from those legally responsible for making decisions about it?
How hairsplitting can the FBI be in acknowledging “extreme carelessness” while denying “gross negligence” about the same events, at the same time, and in the same respect?
These are questions that now beg for answers in light of what can only be the politically motivated FBI report delivered earlier this week on the likely criminal behavior of Hillary Clinton.
More
7 comments:
The easiest way around this, is to
Not Vote for her. Most of the Eastern Shore
is not voting for her anyway.
Wish this Blog was read Nation Wide.
This does not relate to the article, but I pulled up the "official" Facebook pages of Hillary and Donald Trump today. This is interesting!
Hillary Clinton- 4,295,216 likes
Donald Trump- 8,703,895 likes
Kinda makes you think that despite what the media says, more people want Trump as our next President. I'd like to think so anyway. LOL
The Clintons do not have different rules; they have *NO* rules!
It doesn't matter what the American people want.
Don't you get it yet?
"Rules? We don't need no stinking rules."
The Clintons have broken the laws for many years and people have written of such in books. If all those books were untrue, then the writers and publishers would have been sued by now. But Bill and Hillary know too many would testify against them.
6:30 You are correct. The sooner people realize this, maybe something will change. I doubt it, though.
Post a Comment