Liberals swear they want to have a reasonable conversation about guns. It turns out, all they're interested in is trying to make responsible gun owners look like fools. As the Washington Free Beacon notes:
The makers of a new Katie Couric documentary on gun violence deceptively edited an interview between Couric and a group of gun rights activists in an apparent attempt to embarrass the activists, an audio recording of the full interview shows.
At the 21:48 mark of Under the Gun a scene of Katie Couric interviewing members of the Virginia Citizens Defense League, a gun rights organization, is shown.
Couric can be heard in the interview asking activists from the group, “If there are no background checks for gun purchasers, how do you prevent felons or terrorists from purchasing a gun?”
The documentary then shows the activists sitting silently for nine awkward seconds, unable to provide an answer. It then cuts to the next scene.
However, raw audio of the interview between Katie Couric and the activists provided to theWashington Free Beacon shows the scene was deceptively edited. Instead of silence, Couric’s question is met immediately with answers from the activists. A back and forth between a number of the league’s members and Couric over the issue of background checks proceeds for more than four minutes after the original question is asked.
A liberal's entire worldview when it comes to guns is premised on the notion that gun owners are irresponsible, trigger happy menaces to society who leave firearms lying around willy nilly so that their children can find them. These afterschool special level histrionics drive all liberal gun control campaigns, in the absence of any sort of real inquiry.
So instead of hearing out gun owners and presenting them as the reasonable people they are, Couric, a journalist, engaged in creative editing in order to perpetuate an absurd myth. As Charles Cooke of the National Review notes:
Let’s be clear, here: This is lying. It is dishonesty. It is, in a disfavored word, propaganda. It is also typical. I am frequently struck by how quickly opponents of the Second Amendment resort to mendacity, conflation, and hyperbole, and this incident serves as no exception. This, I suppose, should not surprise, for such behavior is the product of intellectual and moral weakness, and the gun control movement is nothing if not intellectually and morally weak. Those who are comfortable in their arguments do not need to dissemble. Those who have the facts on their side do not need to play games. Those who are capable of debating cogently do not need to silence their opponents, nor to use trickery to make their critics look stupid. Katie Couric is not comfortable, factual, or capable.
Source: AAN
12 comments:
Why do you get to lump all liberals together as being the same, but get bent out of shape when all gun owners are viewed the same way.
Like this is news. All democrats are liars. There isn't a democrat alive who isn't a pathological liar.
Did Couric actually edit the interview footage? Does she stand behind the edit?
Fired from CBS should've ended her career. Why people keep enabling failure in this country is beyond my comprehension. She's been a failure and fake from the start. This is the very reason why MSM only has about 7% of the population believing in them anymore.
In Maryland not only do you have to wait seven days for a background check by the State Police. But you have to take an eight hour class pay fifty dollars to get a handgun qualification license to even purchase the gun.
I truly can't stand the sight of her.
Likewise for barking Hillary!
Why don't we apply the same Second Amendment restrictions to the First Amendment and Fifteenth Amendment. I believe we need a so called "background check" for mental health to VOTE! Why is it that liberals and progressives are so obsessed with violating the Second Amendment but want a free for all with the Fifteenth? If we are NOT required to show a drivers license to VOTE, then we shouldn't be required to show one to buy a firearm!!! As everyone can see the shape our country is in, VOTING is more dangerous than any firearm.
12:12 - Let me answer for you. We are not all the same and we should not generalize I agree. But here is the difference. Gun owners come from both political parties, many different racial backgrounds, religious backgrounds and so on. So we really cannot generalize because of so many variables. All liberal politicians are liars, thieves, hate America, hate individual freedom. Liberals vote for liberals - well you get the point. Now I understand you might not hate America, but if you vote for people like Obama you are voting to hate America.
Because 12:12 just being a liberal and a democrat makes you a foul disgusting putrid person. It's not like it's rocket science or anything. It means you stand with and are one of the lying immoral crude vulgar and perverted people.
Gun owners on the other hand are the very first ones to say when a gun owner is irresponsible and will call them out.
Kiss your guns goodbye if Hillary gets elected.
Let’s be clear, here: This is lying. It is dishonesty.
Actually is is worse then that, it is journalistic malpractice.
Sand Box John
Say what you will, like her or not, at least Sarah Palin didn't lie.
Post a Comment