As the nation and official Washington prepared to mourn the late Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia, watchers of the high court began to assess the immediate impact of his death on several pending cases whose decisions might have had momentous political implications.
Among these is Friedrichs v. California Teacher’s Association, set to have been a landmark case regarding the mandatory collection of union dues and their use for political purposes. The ruling could have meant the death knell of collective bargaining and the political might of America’s unions.
After oral arguments in the case in January, The Washington Post indicated the court’s conservative majority, including Scalia, were leaning to rule against the unions ability to collect mandatory dues.
But Scalia’s passing – and the news that the Republic-led Senate will likely not confirm an Obama nominee — means such cases could up with 4-4 decisions. Lacking a majority, the lower court’s rulings will stand.
In the Friedrichs case, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals had ruled in favor of the teacher’s union.
More
3 comments:
Hmmm. Maybe it wasn't natural causes.
The teachers union here in MD is a joke. No teeth, but plenty of my money. I'm all for protecting the working people but I think there has to be a better way.
Ever since the crash of 2009 employers here on the shore have been taking, taking, and taking. Without any giving, no wonder our best and brightest flee this area.
i keep saying that. he knew too much
Post a Comment