Attention

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not represent our advertisers

Wednesday, September 09, 2015

What happens when the government limits payday lending

Payday lenders open branches in neighborhoods where banks won't go. They give people a place to cash their checks, and they make loans to those whom no credit card company would trust with plastic. The cash isn't free, though. The money has to be paid back, and for many borrowers, the only way to pay off a loan is by taking out another. For them, payday lending often isn't a lifeline, but a trap.

Policymakers who want to protect these borrowers from predatory lending not only risk cutting off much-needed credit for people who really need it, but they also risk implying that the poor can't make sound financial decisions on their own.

That was the complicated dilemma facing the Obama administration earlier this year when officials proposed new restrictions on the $50 billion payday industry. Under the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau's proposal, borrowers would be allowed to take out no more than two additional loans to pay back an original loan. People who really needed a loan would be able to get one, the bureau hopes, but loans wouldn't turn into a cycle of debt.

More

4 comments:

USMCRetired said...

Only in America that we establish businesses that prey and take advantage of ignorant citizens who are and have always been financially challenged. People with bad credit who already don't pay their bills now have another avenue to further increase their indebtedness. Unethical businessman much like drug pushers, put people in a cycle that they cannot escape. These companies should be illegal and closed!

Anonymous said...

Hate to be the guy holding the paper on the third loan.

Anonymous said...

This used to be called loan sharking and we had laws against it. This is what you get from the less regulations crowd, now anything goes.

Anonymous said...

Before payday lenders a persons payday loan was robbing the liquor store. Which would you rather have?