The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not represent our advertisers

Wednesday, June 24, 2015

More Evidence: More Spending Does Not Improve Education

Mr. Szafir is the education policy director at the Wisconsin Institute for Law & Liberty. Mr. Lueken is its education research director.

Have we hit a wall where more spending on traditional public schools will not lead to improved student learning? Applying commonly-accepted statistical tools to our home state of Wisconsin, we found that this may be the case. Like the United States, Wisconsin has spent more on public schools but has not gotten more for this investment.

In the U.S., since 1966, per-student spending in constant dollars on public education has increased by 300%. In 2011, the U.S. spent $11,841 for every student enrolled in traditional primary and secondary public schools. This amount is 5th highest among all countries in the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and $2,973 per pupil higher than the OECD average. At such an amount, it’s very difficult to question our commitment to funding public education.

Yet, despite these expenditures, we have failed to create a world-class education system. Among OECD countries, the U.S. ranks 27th in math, 17th in reading, and 20th in science. Less than one-third of all U.S. students are proficient in math and reading. We also struggle to educate poor children. More than half of the OECD countries had higher portions of resilient children, poor children who manage to perform in the top quartile of students in OECD countries, than the U.S.

This trend of high spending for, at best, lackluster student performance reverberates across the country, and the Badger State is no exception. In Wisconsin, about 88% of all students are enrolled in the “one-size-fits-all” traditional public school system, which has educated children the same way for decades. Wisconsin spends $1,219 per child more than the U.S. average, ranking 16th out of 50 states in expenditures for public elementary and secondary education.



Anonymous said...

Legislating that all students will show average or above average achievement is ludicrous. Look at ability test scores and ask why teachers are supposed to be miracle workers. It just isn't politically correct to suggest that students with below average ability will probably score at below average levels.

Anonymous said...

I am a teacher, and i know money is not the problem. We make very good salaries with very good benefit packages as well. Discipline and accountability are the problems. You can throw all the money you want at a douchebag and they will still be a douchebag. The new schools waste so much money on technology that is overkill, and rarely gets used to its potential. Bring back discipline, accountability, and adult control in the schools if you ever want our education systems to succeed again.

Anonymous said...

12:28 Wow, Thank You for a fresh dose of truth. My wife was an assistant teacher for several years and she would tell me the horror stories with no support from the school administration. I was ready to kick butt on several occasions. She finally quit with my blessing over the discipline and accountability problems, she loved teaching the kids that wanted to learn.