The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not represent our advertisers

Sunday, January 20, 2013

UN Gun Grab On Pace For March

In just two months the globalists of the UN will gather in New York City to put the final touches on plans to impose strict regulations worldwide on the right of the individual to buy, sell, trade, or own guns and ammunition.

On March 18, 2013 in New York City the next round of negotiations is scheduled to begin, with one aim in mind: eradicate private gun ownership.

On Christmas Eve, 2012, the United Nations General Assembly approved a resolution to renew negotiations on the global Arms Trade Treaty (ATT).

The measure was approved by a vote of 133-0, with 17 countries abstaining.

As reported by Reuters, the foreign ministers of Argentina, Australia, Costa Rica, Finland, Japan, Kenya, and the United Kingdom – the countries that drafted the resolution – released a joint statement praising the passage of the resolution to move ahead on the global gun ban.

"This was a clear sign that the vast majority of U.N. member states support a strong, balanced and effective treaty, which would set the highest possible common global standards for the international transfer of conventional arms," the foreign ministers said in their statement.
As The New American has reported, when the treaty was being deliberated in July, the United States was the only obstacle preventing the global arms control regulations from being imposed on the world.

Miraculously, however, all the points of the agreement Secretary of State Hillary Clinton found so distasteful in the summer were made so much more palatable after President Obama’s reelection, and every single attack on the right to bear arms remains in the version of the treaty approved on November 7.
Within hours of his securing his reelection, President Obama placed a late night call to the U.S. United Nations delegation ordering them to vote in favor of a passage of L.11.

A story in The Hill reports, however, that “The U.S. mission to the U.N. denied that the timing of the election had anything to do with the treaty’s talks being delayed.”



Anonymous said...

Notice the article states "The vast majority".The entire world has never nor will ever be on the same page with this.It's always us.Even if the people want no part of it the gov always pushes it through.Now the US will be under a microscope to see how WE are complying.If the UN would just move their operations to Europe or Asia all would go better for us.

Anonymous said...

Well said

ginn said...

Well said.., move it.

lmclain said...

Would this have anything to do with the (very quiet) signing of the treaty allowing Canadian military troops to operate inside the United States? Perhaps obama knows that our own military doesn't have enough manpower to subdue the population and that they (the US military) may not willingly go along with a new Nazi regime??