Attention

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not represent our advertisers

Friday, February 10, 2017

ICYMI: Martin O’Malley and Larry Hogan are Both Pushing to End Gerrymandering

From The Washington Post

“We must, on a state-by-state basis, push for an end to gerrymandered congressional districts.’ O’Malley said. ‘. . . This simple reform, already being adopted in some states, must become the new norm of American democracy.’"

The Washington Post
Josh Hicks
February 5, 2017

“Former Maryland governor Martin O’Malley (D) has changed his stance on gerrymandering, a practice he embraced when he redrew the state’s congressional districts more than six years ago.

“During a speech at Boston College last month, O’Malley, who unsuccessfully sought the 2016 Democratic presidential nomination, said he no longer supports partisan redistricting. He said manipulating voting boundaries for political purposes 'digs ideological trenches around incumbents' and deepens the nation’s political divisions.

“‘As a governor, I held that redistricting pen in my own Democratic hand,’ he said. ‘I was convinced that we should use our political power to pass a map that was more favorable for the election of Democratic candidates.’

“Attorneys challenging Maryland’s voting map as unconstitutional are now trying to learn more about O’Malley’s intentions during the state’s 2010 redistricting. Last week, they subpoenaed him to testify as part of a lawsuit challenging the state’s congressional districts. ...

“In his speech, O’Malley said nonpartisan commissions should draw voting maps — the same position espoused by Gov. Larry Hogan, the moderate Republican whose 2014 defeat of then-Lt. Gov. Anthony G. Brown (D) was seen as a repudiation of much of O’Malley’s legacy.

“We must, on a state-by-state basis, push for an end to gerrymandered congressional districts.’ O’Malley said. ‘. . . This simple reform, already being adopted in some states, must become the new norm of American democracy.’ ...

‘We got a lot of difficult stuff done, but this is a goal that another governor will have to accomplish,’ the former governor said. ‘Maybe in hindsight we could have made that part of the redistricting negotiations in 2010.’

“Hogan proposed legislation last year and this year that would create a nonpartisan redistricting panel to set congressional and legislative districts for Maryland. ...

“O’Malley and Hogan said they have made no attempt to team up to push to end gerrymandering.

‘We’ll try to reach out to him,’ Hogan said this week. ‘I’m glad to have him on board.’ ...

“Critics of Maryland’s congressional map say it is one of the most gerrymandered in the nation, with several districts contorted in ways that make little sense geographically.

“The 6th District covers much of Montgomery County, then winds north to the Pennsylvania line and turns sharply west to West Virginia. A federal judge once described the 3rd Congressional District as a ‘broken-winged pterodactyl, lying prostrate across the center of the state.’

“Jennifer Bevan-Dangel, executive director of Common Cause Maryland, said the state map is ‘a clear case of what gerrymandering looks like.’

“‘We only needed to move about 300,000 people to reflect the last census changes, but they moved over 1 million people,’ she said. ‘Clearly there was motivation beyond us making sure the census was reflected in our districts.’" ...

11 comments:

Anonymous said...

That redistricting in and near PG County remains one of the most embarrassing examples of gerrymandering in the nation. It flew in the face of almost every redistricting rule on the books, slicing up those areas with the sole intent of giving power to one party and one party only. It was and is a slap in the face to everyone in the state.

Anonymous said...

O'misfit is standing down for a couple reasons:

Change the law QUICK So republicans cant gerrymander it back.

So they'll show some leniency on his upcoming prison sentence.

And because Md liberals have turned their back on this crooked snake.

Anonymous said...

6:17
I was going to make the same comment , glad you have also noticed this . Now we all know that the city (Salisbury) has tried and has had some success . Salisbury is another good example. I'm sure it's the same all over the country.
An infestation of minority groups often determines this ( I say infestation meaning low housing or the projects that bring ignorance to the political arena . Sharee Sample Hughes is a good example.
Of course P.G. County is by far the best example .

Anonymous said...

This issue is in reference to Congressional districts, as is the ongoing lawsuit. It has nothing to do with the city of Salisbury. O'malley is a hack. The primary issue is Maryland's 6th district that was held by Republicans for decades. Add a few thousand Montgomery county Democrats to the district and the seat changes hands.O'malley is a hypocrite and has no shame.

Anonymous said...

Somebody please just draw a straight grid and overlay it over the Maryland map, or even county by county. No crooked lines, just a straight grid.

How hard is that?

Anonymous said...

So why the mea culpa moment now? Is it because Hogan was going to start redrawing districts? Or have liberal constituents moved? O'Malley does not have a conscience, and everything he does is political.

Anonymous said...

O'mucky is urging them to pass the law before correcting his gerrymandering, thereby insuring forever democrat chains on md.

Anonymous said...

This failed governor "O" has shown what a loser he is. If I remember he was the former failure in control of this good state. What is it with these idiots, like the bum that just walked out of our WH. They just continue damaging us. If that nut job old man from DE wants to take somebody out back, he should start with his own crowd of friends.

Anonymous said...

Who cares what O'M says?? Who keeps pushing his name to the news??? A waste of journalistic effort.

Anonymous said...

I would never trust anything o'taxey ever has to say and or do
Always do the opposite of what ever they say or do
Always lying

Anonymous said...

Because districts are determined by population, not geographic size.