Project Veritas: New Just Released Video Shows Direct (And Illegal) Coordination Between Clinton Campaign, Dem Operatives, And Trump Protests

Please take the time to read this and SHARE SHARE SHARE!  If the truth could get to enough voters it would be a game changer!  This video is clear indication of a federal crime.  The Federal Election Commission should be forced to investigate NOW.

New Released  Video Shows Direct (And Illegal) Coordination Between Clinton Campaign, Dem Operatives, And Trump Protests

James O’Keefe’s Project Veritas released their third investigative video exposing the dark web of Democratic operatives and consultants who are seen allegedly colluding to instigate violence at Trump rallies, take part in voter fraud schemes, and provide a hub from where pro-Clinton super PACs can establish lines of communication. In this third video, taken from a yearlong investigation into the Clinton campaign’s inner workings, we have allegations that Hillary Clinton herself is involved with some of the activities at Trump rallies. “In the end, it was candidate Hillary Clinton, the future president of the United States who wanted ducks on the ground, so, by God, we will get ducks on the ground, said top Democratic operative Bob Creamer. “Don’t repeat that to anybody,” he added. The operations called for activists to shadow Trump/Pence events dressed as Donald Duck, a swipe at the Republican nominee’s refusal to release his tax returns. O’Keefe alleges that the Clinton campaign, working with the DNC, and the non-profit Americans United for Change is anillegal coordinated campaign activity. Project Veritas contacted lawyers on the subject who told them, “The ducks on the ground are likely public communications for purposes of the law. It’s political activity opposing Trump, paid for by Americans United For Change funds but controlled by Clinton and her campaign.” Creamer had daily conference calls with representatives from the Clinton campaign and AUFC’s web of operatives; Creamer also works for AUFC as well. The reason the Donald Duck operations went from DNC to AUFC was because there was some trademark issue that Donna Brazile, interim DNC chair, was worried about. “The duck has to be an Americans United For Change entity. This had to do only with some problem between Donna Brazile and ABC, which is owned by Disney, because they were worried about a trademark issue. That’s why. It’s really sily,” said Creamer. He later says that Brazil didn’t want to get sued due to her contributor status with ABC. “We originally launched this duck because Hillary wants the duck,” said Creamer. And even with the change in quarterbacks regarding this operation, O’Keefe says the DNC and the Clinton campaign were still “running the show.” Bob Creamer and Scott Foval were two of the main principals featured in the first two videos. Creamer’s firm, Democracy Partners, has deep ties to the Clinton campaign and the Obama White House. Between November 21, 2011 and June 24, 2016, Creamer visited the White House 342 times, 47 of which were directly with the president. Creamer has gone to jail for tax violations and bank fraud, which landed him a five-month jail sentence with eleven months house arrest in 2006. The site WeaselZippers asked, “what was this ‘black hat’ guy, convicted felon, doing on such great terms with the White House?” Mr. Foval, who is captured talking about hiring the mentally ill and the homeless to carry out his objectives at rallies, was let go from his national field director position at Americans United From Change after O’Keefe’s videos were released. Mr. Creamer also resigned from his role with the Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee as a result of Project Veritas’ investigation. There was a bit of anxiety with this last video as it took an unusually long time for it to upload to YouTube.  Follow James O'Keefe

When Major Media Look the Other Way       By Robert Knight   Two Democratic Party campaign operatives lost their jobs last Tuesday after being caught red-handed on video describing how to incite violence at Donald Trump rallies and how to commit massive voter fraud. Captured by video sting journalist James O'Keefe of Project Veritas Action, the men's self-incriminating comments and severances are being ignored by major media, which either pretend this never happened or are trying to besmirch the source. The media are also ignoring ongoing bombshells from WikiLeaks, such as Hillary Clinton campaign chief John Podesta suggesting in an email that illegal aliens can vote if they have driver's licenses. Is it any wonder why millions of Americans feel that this election is being "rigged" by a hyper-partisan media, aided by an Obama administration that is using the Justice Department to attack safeguards such as voter photo ID laws? "Not only have the videos been ignored by ABC, CBS, and NBC, most of the nation's most prestigious newspapers haven't touched it, according to a Nexis search for Project Veritas," the Media Research Center reported on Thursday. "The following news outlets can be added to the Zero Coverage list so far: The New York Times, USA Today, the Los Angeles Times, The Boston Globe and the Chicago Tribune. The PBS NewsHour and NPR transcripts also came up with a zero. [and] The Associated Press was still a zero." On Wednesday, NPR ran a skeptical piece that dismisses "voter fraud bluster," but did include the first full video. Of major news media, only Fox News and The Washington Times, plus online news aggregator The Drudge Report, have amply covered the explosive revelations. Robert Creamer, founder of Democracy Advocates and the husband of Rep. Janice D. Schakowsky, Illinois Democrat, resigned from the Clinton campaign on Tuesday, a day after Scott Foval was fired as national field director of Americans United for Change.  Mr. Creamer, who pled guilty in 2005 to charges of bank fraud and tax violations, visited the White House 342 times since 2009 and met with President Obama 47 times, according to White House records obtained by the Daily Caller. On Tuesday, CNN ran a four-minute segment on "undercover videos produced by discredited conservative activist James O' Keefe." Setting up the segment, CNN's Drew Griffin says of Mr. Foval, he "supposedly explains" how Democrat-paid agitators instigated violence at Trump rallies." There's nothing "supposedly" about it. "CBS This Morning" ran a two-minute segment on Thursday with Nancy Cordes. The piece ran less-harmful portions of the videos, and ended with denials from Democratic National Committee officials, plus Ms. Cordes' own stamp: "There's no indication Clinton's campaign paid for it or even knew about it."  Really? Mr. Foval, working with Americans United for Change, a Democratic advocacy group, explains on camera that, "I answer to the head of special events for the DNC and the head of special events and political for the campaign," he sad. "The campaign pays DNC, DNC pays Democracy Partners, Democracy Partners pays the Foval Group, the Foval Group goes and executes the s - t on the ground." And what is the "s - t on the ground?" Deploying mentally ill and homeless people, union members and women to incite violence at Trump rallies. "What I call it is conflict engagement," Mr. Foval says. "in the lines at Trump rallies - we're starting anarchy here." No, there's nothing to see here, folks. Here are some other takeaways: Aaron Black, whose real last name is Minter, describes himself as "deputy rapid response director for the DNC for all things Trump on the ground." He says he worked for Democracy Partners but that, "Nobody's really supposed to know about me. So the Chicago protest, when they shut all that, that was us." One of the operatives says, "It doesn't matter what the friggin' legal and ethics people say, we need to win this [mother-expletive]." In the second video, Mr. Foval explains how to get people to cross state lines from Indiana and Michigan to vote illegally in Wisconsin - use cars instead of buses, since buses might alert officials to the vote fraud. He says of campaign finance laws, "like, they have weakened them so bad in these three states, you could [openly commit an obscene act] in front of the governor and not go to jail." The obscenity-laced interviews on the videos contain many more incriminating or incendiary statements, such as a declaration about Iowa that "half the state is racist as [expletive] Wisconsin is just as bad." Mr. O'Keefe promises that more videos are on the way. Perhaps state agencies might want to look into possible violations. Perhaps they won't grant immunity to key figures or have evidence destroyed the way the FBI did in the Hillary Clinton Servergate case. And perhaps the media could be shamed into covering at least some of these sensational cases of Democratic election malfeasance. Somebody needs to hint that Republicans might be involved. That should get them excited enough to do their jobs. * Robert Knight is a senior fellow at the American Civil Rights Union. http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/oct/23/democratic-party-operatives-make-mischief-media-lo/