Four years ago, libertarians were an important force in the Republican presidential race. In the campaign for the 2012 nomination, Ron Paul was routinely drawing big crowds on college campuses.
He made a strong third-place showing in Iowa's important first-in-the-nation caucuses. Even though he failed to win the 2012 nomination, his supporters continued to organize, drawing attention to their small-government beliefs and taking over control of much of the Republican Party of Iowa for a time.
Many observers thought so-called "liberty movement" candidates might have an edge in 2016. But for Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul, the heir apparent to the liberty movement in Iowa, that hasn't panned out.
Post-2012 Struggles
Heading into the 2016 cycle, there were headlines predicting that Rand Paul would build on his father's success and upend the political system.
"Instead, they've been having to spend most of their time defending votes they probably already had when this process started," said Matt Strawn, an Iowa-based GOP strategist.
Strawn is a former Republican Party of Iowa chairman. He was forced out in 2012, and eventually supporters of Ron Paul gained control of the state party for a time.
In the aftermath of the 2012 election, the Paul brand was sullied in Iowa, at least in part, by allegations of improprieties by some of his campaign staffers. And his grassroots supporters eventually lost their hold on the party leadership.
More
7 comments:
Why? Maybe it's his condescending manner or seemingly angry all the time.
Just an observation.
Before running for president, Rand has said a lot of things that indicate he is not as smart, eloquent, ballsy or big-thinking as his dad. I think that impression has stuck and is likely accurate.
Yeah, he ain't too smart. I knows because my sisters' boy gots one of them doctoring degrees from Duke colege or something like that. Unbelievable! This is part of the problem with republicans. They aren't even happy with other republican. Keep fighting amongst yourselves while Hillary gets elected.
He tried to play both sides of the issues.
He looks like a village idiot when he speaks....just rambles to hear himself......total idiot....
3:16 Isn't that Jeb?
No it's not Jeb.John is 3:16
Post a Comment