Former Secretary of State and 2016 Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton was asked in an official congressional inquiry from former House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform chairman Rep. Darrell Issa (R-CA) about whether she used a private email for government work as far back as 2012.
The letter from Issa to Clinton, sent on Dec. 13, 2012 and obtained by Breitbart News after an explosive New York Times expose on it late Tuesday evening, specifically asks eight detailed questions about government record-keeping.
“Have you or any senior agency official ever used a personal e-mail account to conduct official business?” the first question reads. “If so, please identify the account used.”
“Please provide written documentation of the agency’s policies regarding the use of non-official e-mail accounts to conduct official business, including, but not limited to, archiving and record keeping procedures, as well as disciplinary proceedings for employees in violation of these policies,” Issa asked Clinton.
The next question follows up on that. “Does the agency require employees to certify on a periodic basis or at the end of their employment with the agency they have turned over any communications involving official business that they have sent or received using non-official accounts?” Issa asked Clinton.
“What agency policies and procedures are currently in place to ensure that all messages related to official business sent or received by federal employees and contractors on private, non-governmental e-mail accounts or social networking platforms are properly categorized as federal records?” the seventh question to Clinton from Issa reads.
There are several major takeaways from this development, as it breathes brand new life into the scandal rocking Clinton as she just launched her 2016 presidential campaign this week.
The first is that she was clearly aware that her private email account was a serious issue as far back as during her time at the State Department.
Secondly, she deliberately decided to not respond to the inquiry—waiting for officials at the State Department to do so well after she resigned, and even further after the deadline for a response. The actual deadline was Jan. 7, 2013.
The third major takeaway is that after Clinton was made aware this was an issue, she deleted upwards of 30,000 emails that she or her staff deemed to be private and not government-related.
There's lots more here..
DelMarVa's Premier Source for News, Opinion, Analysis, and Human Interest Contact Publisher Joe Albero at alberobutzo@wmconnect.com or 410-430-5349
3 comments:
Some of the things she did are CLEARLY criminal. Clearly.
WHY has she not been charged?
Because there are TWO sets of laws.
One for them and one for us. OUR set of laws puts us in prison.
THEIR set of laws makes them President.
Since obama, his Chief of Staff, the Secret Service, the State Department, and many other officials KNEW about some of these crimes, WHY hasn't the RICO statute been used against them?
Federal prosecutors put "we the people" in prison for LIFE for criminal conspiracies. All it takes is a one sentence conversation about whatever crime they are looking at and BOOM! -- you just became involved in a RICO criminal conspiracy and the prosecutors are drooling at the prospect of putting you away for years.
Oh right . The "two sets of laws" thing.
Since obama set the bar so low for becoming President, Hillary's extensive and long list of non-accomplishments (except being the wife of Monica's long term boyfriend), should be more than enough to help her become the next "I don't know what to do, but I can blame my critics for being racists. Or misogynists.
Always works like a charm!
Keep cheering!
Lock her up for God's sake!!!
I sure hope she get the Bobby Kennedy treatment on the campaigne trail. America needs to be saved.
Post a Comment