They’re manipulating the data.
In this case, lowering the historical temperatures for years prior to 2000. Which makes the temperatures after that look like they’ve risen. Which makes it look like global warming.
Read more
DelMarVa's Premier Source for News, Opinion, Analysis, and Human Interest Contact Publisher Joe Albero at alberobutzo@wmconnect.com or 410-430-5349
Tuesday, January 28, 2014
AGAIN! MASSIVE FUDGING ON GLOBAL-WARMING TEMPS
They’re manipulating the data.
In this case, lowering the historical temperatures for years prior to 2000. Which makes the temperatures after that look like they’ve risen. Which makes it look like global warming.
Read more
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
I think the people of the US are finally waking up about the EPA and it's tangents.
I checked up on this "peer reviewed journal". Check out it's "about us" page.. it clearly has an agenda that is not in line with a credible peer review process.
True Scientific Journals have no agenda. In fact, the pinnacle of peer review is to disprove someones work thus furthering progress in science with... better science. This is WHY the peer review process works.
Lets make this simple. If you were diagnosed with a life threatening cancer, and 95% of Doctors agreed that you needed treatment... why would you listen to the 5% that said you don't? That is what it is like to deny credible climate science.
Where it gets screwed up is when politicians try to use this information to further their political goals. That's where it gets messed up.
Post a Comment