Attention

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not represent our advertisers

Monday, December 02, 2013

The 2016 Presidential Candidate That No One Is Talking About

There is a candidate lurking for a 2016 run that could change our nation’s history forever, and not in a good way. I am going to go on record with a prediction here and I honestly hope I end up with egg on my face.

It is my belief that a 3rd party candidate is being hand-picked and/or groomed as we speak. This is not just a normal 3rd party candidate that will get 1-2% of the vote. I believe this candidate will be more like Ross Perot and seriously complicate the election while guaranteeing that Hillary Clinton will become our next president.

It’s time for a reality check. We need to look no further than the recent Virginia Governor’s race.

It was not necessarily the strength of McAuliffe that defeated Ken Cuccinelli. It was more the presence of a third party (Libertarian) candidate named Robert Sarvis, who was able to gain 6.5% of the popular vote. Most of those votes came from Cuccinelli and thus guaranteed a McAuliffe victory.

More

9 comments:

Anonymous said...

Sarvis wasn't really a Libertarian when you look at his platform. Advocating GPS tracking in cars? Get real!

And any argument for one of either dysfunctional party is a false one. Voting for the lesser of two evils is still voting for evil.

Anonymous said...

I for one certainly don't oppose any third party candidate.our country has been going down the crapper for many years now . I'm looking for the type of change no liberal for RINO can provide .

Anonymous said...

Third party candidate are idiots that don't have a chance in Hell to win. All they have done is ruin important elections and it affects all of us who needed the win. If they were really concerned about helping a party or making a party better they should stick with the Republican party and work on changing them for the better.

3:39 PM is another idiot who is totally clueless. People like him shouldn't be allowed to vote.

Anonymous said...

Way too far gone for ANYONE to make a serious difference.

Anonymous said...

Just look at who backed him--he was a "planted" candidate to take the vote away from the republican.

Bullard Construction said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Anonymous said...

6:15 PM

You are one nasty person. Aside for attacking someone for his view and opinion, you would rather a repub steal our money and spend it over a demoncrat. And you have the nerve to call someone a clueless idiot. Have you, or anyone else, seen any real LASTING difference when either party was in power?

Our economy is a ponzi scheme and government and politics are a shell game. No matter who, or which party gains power, WE still lose each time.

Is the hot water in the pot boiling yet? Ribbet...

Anonymous said...

To 6:15, and others in her court.... I am 59, and have voted for the "lesser of two evils" for 40 years.

Now, please, step back and look:

Who is in office now, as we speak? How happy are you with this?

Who was his alternative? (speaking of Obamacare), and how happy would you have been with him?

How the heck can you claim, after answering these two simple questions, could you possibly vote for either the GOP or DEM party?
I am 59 and have voted for the "least ignorant butthead" for 40 years, and look what we have on our plates!

Do you really believe that another R/D will "save the day"???????

REALLY?

If you do, we are doomed. I voted Gary Johnson last time, because he deserved the job. Not Mitt or BO.

Anonymous said...

That's exactly the plan.