Last Thursday, November 21, is a day that will live in infamy.
Harry Reid pulled the trigger on the "nuclear option" -- a process whereby 52 Senate Democrats voted to change the Senate rules by brute force. (See the vote here, where “YEA” was the pro-gun vote.)
He did this for the ostensible purpose of packing the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals with three anti-gun judges -- one of which (Robert Wilkins) has held that the Second Amendment doesn't protect the right to purchase firearms, just the right to possess them.
But make no mistake about it: The Senate now effectively has no rules. This means that, if Supreme Court "swing vote" Anthony Kennedy were to die or resign tomorrow, Obama would shove through another virulently anti-gun nominee.
This would mean that Obama’s lasting legacy would be to reverse the Heller and McDonald Supreme Court decisions. And, as far as the Court is concerned, the Second Amendment would be nothing, other than the right of a state to raise a militia.
So a vote for the nuclear option on Thursday was a vote to begin the process of effectively repealing the Second Amendment.
Don't believe your lying anti-gun senator -- the one who also told you that you could "keep your insurance." In an effort to cover their rear ends, Thursday's rules change purports to exempt Supreme Court nominees from the 50-vote non-filibusterable procedure.
But one would have to be a fool to think that 52 Democrats who would blow up the Senate over an appeals court would not do the same if the balance on the Supreme Court were at stake.
More
2 comments:
Our last chance to take our country back (legally) will be in 2014 at the mid-term elections.
Wake-up people!
Oh yeah. Some NEW guys are going to change things. Yes indeedy. New guys have been changing things for a while now. How's it working? What? YOUR guy really means it this time? How many times do you need to be slapped before you try to stop the slapping?? Apparently, quite a few times...
Post a Comment