Contrary evidence arises as U.S. considers punishing Assad regime
NEW YORK – As the U.S. considers a response to what it calls a chemical weapon attack by Syria’s Bashar al-Assad regime that killed hundreds of civilians, reliable Middle Eastern sources say they have evidence the culprits actually were the rebel forces trying to take over the government.
Secretary of State John Kerry accused the Assad government Monday of covering up the use of chemical weapons in “a cowardly crime” and a “moral obscenity” that shocked the world’s conscience. Kerry claimed the Obama administration had “undeniable” evidence “that the Assad government was culpable in the use of chemical weapons on civilians” in the Aug. 21 attack in Damascus suburbs.
Reports that the Obama administration is considering a military strike against the Assad government continued to circulate Monday. Meanwhile, U.N. weapon inspectors in Syria were fired upon by snipers as they attempted to investigate the site of the Aug. 21 attack.
Assad has rejected charges that his government forces used chemical weapons as “preposterous” and “completely politicized,” the Los Angeles Times reported.
More
8 comments:
There idiots are going to get us into WW III
Lies,lies,lies.
This incident has all the markings of a "false flag" event, in which allies are attached to create an excuse to provoke a war.
It doesn't make sense that the Assad government would use wide scale chemical weapons on civilians within 10 miles of the UN chemical weapons inspectors.
We should take closer look at 9/11, with "false flags" in mind.
Personally, I have come to believe that not only is the unthinkable possible, its likely.
I'm afraid to go on Infowars site.Alex must be having a field day with this one.
Your right. He told us this would happen months ago and he was right. NWO.
I would not put anything past this regime. Hussien needs an excuse to take out Assad so his muslim brothers can take over and will do whatever it takes to make it happen.
Yeah, now maybe we know what was REALLY going on in Benghazi.
Most certainly Barak's CIA was involved.
Who are you going to believe? Obama, Kerry, Clinton and Holder, or the folks that were there witnessing the attacks, I.E. the residents?
Those folks know who is on who's side...
Post a Comment