DelMarVa's Premier Source for News, Opinion, Analysis, and Human Interest Contact Publisher Joe Albero at alberobutzo@wmconnect.com or 410-430-5349
DelMarVa's Premier Source for News, Opinion, Analysis, and Human Interest Contact Publisher Joe Albero at alberobutzo@wmconnect.com or 410-430-5349
21 comments:
He was found guilty on one count of CDS-not marijuana. The other 2 counts of CDS-not marijuana and 3 counts of Paraphenalia were nolle prosed.
Every drug dealers mother should be on council so they can get off that easy.
like father , like son.
cds= controlled dangerous substance.
cds=Laura Mitchell and husband
He had a valid prescription for all but one drug. But facts don't matter on this blog.
Well 3:17 Then I guess some blame rests on police for their SYCOPHANT charging regimen huh?
317 is that u laura
It's that "all but one drug" that gets you convicted.
He didn't have a valid prescription for one drug, meaning that he illegally possessed it. Facts do matter.
Eureka --
a great defense in my murder case -- I've shot at lots of persons but this is the first time I hit the target.
Joe:
What's the scoop on her husband -- was he fired by Salisbury Univ?
Mitchell's son is a junkie this will not be the last time you see him arrested.Go get him SPD keep locking up all of these thieving junkies.
Anonymous said...
He had a valid prescription for all but one drug. But facts don't matter on this blog.
May 3, 2013 at 3:17 PM
And we know this is a 'fact' how?
Would that one ILLEGAL prescription be Oxycodone or would it be Methadone that was prescribed to someone else?
Dr. Fox wrote valid prescriptions too. He wrote them for anyone that could pay the price, until he was arrested.
Anonymous said...
Joe:
What's the scoop on her husband -- was he fired by Salisbury Univ?
May 3, 2013 at 7:23 PM
He is no longer working there as a chemistry professor, but he is still living illegally in subsidized Milford Twilley housing with that entitlement queen who was working on her CPA degree. Funny she isn't taking any classes either, but it looked important on her campaign literature.
The courts ruled and even though I may not agree with it that is how this matter stands. I agree that once marked follow up is needed to straighten him out or have justice served.
Proud family I'd say
If you don't vote and voice you opinion you have lost all right to bitch and I hope your pockets can support the stupidity I see coming
Wait a minute. He pleaded guilty to one count of CDS and all he got was a fine of $300 and court costs? No jail time, even suspended? Nothing?
Wow. If that had been your kid or mine, you can bet there would have been more to the sentence than a fine.
Isn't this a felony?
"Anonymous said...
He had a valid prescription for all but one drug. But facts don't matter on this blog.
May 3, 2013 at 3:17 PM"
Oh we are just so glad you cleared this up for us 3:17. It's so nice to know that he has valid precriptions for so many CDS's and still feels compelled to break the law and posess another one without a prescription,
Anonymous said...
He had a valid prescription for all but one drug. But facts don't matter on this blog.
May 3, 2013 at 3:17 PM
And what do you call a valid prescription? And why did he have those so called valid prescriptions?
I remember this past year seeing mommy Mitchel riding around on a Fatman Scooter in Walmart. Saw her on crutches. Missed meetings and work shops due to injuries/illness. Do you suppose the non valid prescriptions came from Mommy? Can you be honest about this one?
Not to worry, he will be back in court again - count on it!
The sentence was a little harsher than normal for this defendant. Most are offered the State's Attorneys Office First Time Offender program. This is still a conviction it is not a Probabtion Before Judgement, which most first time offenders are offered with the successful completion of the SAO First Time offender program.
Had he acquired an Attorney and even a Public Defender, he would have faired much better with his sentencing.
Post a Comment