In 1983 a registered Democrat shot and wounded Ronald Reagan.
In 2007 a registered Democrat named Seung-Hui Cho shot and killed 32 people in Virginia Tech.
In 2010 a mentally ill registered Democrat named Jared Lee Loughner shot Rep. Gabrielle Giffords and killed 6 others.
In 2011 a registered Democrat named James Holmes went into a movie theater and shot and killed 12 people.
In 2013 a registered Democrat named Adam Lanza shot and killed 26 people in a school.
One could go on, but you get the point, even if the media does not.
Clearly, there is a problem with Democrats and guns.
SOLUTION: It should simply be illegal for Democrats to own guns.
7 comments:
SOLUTION: It should simply be illegal for Democrats to own guns.
No, it should be illegal for murderers to own guns.
Problem is, you don't know who they are until they murder someone. Even criminals are allowed to own guns except for felony, domestic abuse or acts of violence CONVICTIONS.
But most, if not all, of these mass murderers have clean criminal records. There are no indicators of them becoming violent, except for the mental instability signals, if they possess any. And then you have to have someone paying attention to notice them and someone else to act upon any information they may receive from that person.
So it seems to me, there really is NO way that anyone can predict, let alone stop, anyone from killing someone else. You may have a select few of criminals and mental subjects, as mentioned above, that you're able to stop any homicidal impulses they may have, but it's really a low number.
There is no physical way possible that anyone can totally disarm any population or stop anyone from obtaining a firearm, if they really wanted one. Solution? There will be no solutions until mankind itself changes its behavior and heart.
I also feel that their should be a bill to strip all liberals of there first amendment rights.
7:14 My goodness. Please don't strip liberals. They are such ugly people no one want's to see them stripped.
Statistics have proven, democrats can not handle the responsibility.
No guns for Democrats.
I think the common denominator for most of those listed is the anti-depressants from doctors. The studies are quick to warn people of suicide as a possible side effect of those anti psychotic meds, however the drug companies won't go one step further and say that homicide is another adverse side affect. Personally I think there is a link with the exception of Booth.
If you look at the cities with the most misery,poverty, crime and murder you will find Long term Democrats in charge. But the Democrats give out free stuff and that is what matters to so many.
Easy solution. Since mental illness is a criteria for barring 2nd amendment rights, liberalism is an easily defined mental illness. No guns for the libs. (Not that they have them anyway, only the elite).
Post a Comment