Attention

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not represent our advertisers

Monday, March 28, 2011

GOP Appears Poised To Take On Entitlements

If there's any place where tea partiers in Congress might hesitate to call for cuts in Social Security and Medicare to shrink the federal debt, Florida's retirement havens should top the list.

Even there, however, Republican lawmakers are racing toward a spending showdown with Democrats exhibiting little nervousness about deep cuts, including those that eventually would hit benefit programs long left alone by politicians.

In fact, many GOP freshmen seem bolder than ever. It's Democrats, especially in the Senate, who are trying to figure out how to handle the popular but costly retirement programs. Congress, meanwhile, is rapidly nearing critical decisions on the budget and the nation's debt ceiling.

In southeast Florida last week, first-term GOP Rep. Allen West, a tea party favorite, called for changes that some might consider radical: abolish the Internal Revenue Service and federal income tax; retain tax cuts for billionaires so they won't shut down their charities; stop extending unemployment benefits that "reward bad behavior" by discouraging people from seeking new jobs.

As for entitlements, West told a friendly town hall gathering in Coral Springs, if Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid "are left on autopilot, if we don't institute some type of reform, they'll subsume our entire GDP" by 2040 or 2050. GDP, or gross domestic product, measures the value of all goods and services produced in the United States.

Social Security, the largest federal program, mainly benefits retirees. Medicare provides health coverage for older people. Medicaid helps those with low incomes. Combined, the three consume about 40 percent of the budget. Their costs are growing rapidly. Social Security and Medicare benefits now exceed the payroll taxes that fund them.

Read more

3 comments:

Anonymous said...

Believe it when I see it. Speaker Boehner is just another drone.

Anonymous said...

They should really stop calling Social-Security an entitlement.

I paid in to that system for all of my adult life and a couple years prior - I didn't get a choice to not contribute.

As far as I am concerned, this is an implied savings annuity contract between everyone that contributed - and the federal government.

While I agree the system has some issues based on income and liabilities, if our government starts stiffing its citizens on this contract...what else will they default on?

Anonymous said...

1:27

Our wonderful lawmakers (on both sides) have raided what used to be called the S S lock box to the point there is no money left. S. S. now has more money going out than it has coming in, and that does not count the fast expanding baby boomers.

Something has to be done and kicking it down the road like the idiot Harry Reid wants to do will only make things much worse.

I personally think S.S. retirement age will have too be raised, also it should be means tested. Why in the world would Bill Gates or Warren Buffet need and extra 1 or 2 thousand dollars a month.