Attention

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not represent our advertisers

Wednesday, October 13, 2010

Greenbackers vs. Goldbugs

The battle to expose the Federal Reserve has been long and arduous. It finally appears that after nearly 100 years of absolute economic control and near complete debasement of the dollar, the Fed’s reign may be coming to an end. Its eventual demise is certain according to Black Swan author Nassim Taleb and others. With all the recent mainstream talk and speculation about the end of the Fed, it is time to debate solutions for the future of America’s currency. This may indeed be the most important discussion of our lifetime.

First, we must be aware that the Federal Reserve, along with other foreign private central banks and the IMF, have long had plans for a global currency.  This is not conspiracy theory mumbo-jumbo anymore, but rather cold hard fact.  Lew Rockwell wrote an excellent article summarizing the IMF’s push for a global currency — the Bancor.  The recent international currency war may be the beginning of creating a false demand for something more stable for international trade.  As all major currencies race to the bottom, the private banking cartel will surely offer their global solution.  We know what their solution will be — continued debt slavery with more centralized control — but what will the people’s solution be?

There seems to be another currency war brewing right here in America.  The debate between the two most popular proposed solutions of adopting the Greenback or the Gold Standard has just officially begun. Last week, Gary North, a Goldbug and author of Honest Money, wrote a scathing attack of Web of Debt author Ellen Brown, a Greenbacker.  He took select samples from her book in an attempt to tie her public bank solution to Hitler, but failed to address the “interest-free” philosophy of her policy. Despite that, he does manage to frame the Goldbug’s argument against the Greenback, or public banking, as inferior:

GO HERE to read more.

4 comments:

Anonymous said...

I doubt many of the readers here will understand the issue - even after reading this article.

Our public education process along with our media indoctrination have been engineered to prevent us from grasping the concepts of fiat currency and interest-free money.

Fruitland Generic Citizen said...

Nice try - but the battle between the hard money policies of Eastern bankers and the soft money policies of Progressives in the Midwest is most assuredly in the US History curriculum in Maryland. The benefits and drawbacks of each position for various groups within the economy are analyzed.

But keep believing public schools just indoctrinate socialism. It's easier that way, right?

Anonymous said...

Ok 12:25
You got me.

Most H.S. graduates know the meaning of fiat currency and how money is created. They understand that our Congress has the power to coin and regulate the value of money (notice "coin") but that the Congress gave that power to a private group of Zionist International Bankers in 1913 illegally. They know that if the Treasury can issue a bond, then it can just as easily issue money - and there is no need for a private Central Bank to print the money with which it buys the bonds and collects interest thereon.

Our Congress has the authority to debase our currency if it wants. Why do we need a Central Bank to debase it and then charge us interest on it in the process?

But then, I dropped out of High School because I just wanted to read Kurt Vonnegut and get stoned.

Anonymous said...

When you dropped out of school did you bump your head?1:14pm