Incident: Burglary
Location: Nentego Drive, Fruitland, Md.
Date and Time: Wednesday, April 22, 2009 between the hours of 8:45 a.m. and 4:10 p.m.
Narrative: Fruitland police responded to a Nentego Drive residence in response to a reported house burglary. The home owner returned to the residence to find that jewelry boxes which were normally closed had been opened and 68 pieces of men’s and women’s jewelry was missing. Further examination by the owner revealed that a Nintendo Wii game console, a Dell laptop computer, two Kodak digital cameras, and a Rossi stainless steel framed .357 revolver were also missing. Total value of the property missing is approximately $57,000.00.
Anyone with information relevant to this investigation is requested to contact the Fruitland Police department at 410-548-2804.
14 comments:
"a Rossi stainless steel framed .357 revolver were also missing. Total value of the property missing is approximately $57,000.00".
wow! what a shame, that stuff will get sold or traded for 50 bucks worth of crack.
I wonder if the thief knew the people -- because how else would they know there was that much jewelry to steal?
That much stuff is long gone, Go to Jersey or south to Florida!
Sound fishy. 57K in jewelry and he/she buys a cheapo pistol.
Maybe their priorities are different than mine.
Insurance scam all the way, avg. house in Nentego is $185,000. I think someone wants thier cake and eat it too.
"Sound fishy. 57K in jewelry and he/she buys a cheapo pistol.
Maybe their priorities are different than mine."
Maybe they realize they wear the jewelry and not the gun? If it's all gonna get stolen then I guess load up on the jewels.
Nentego Woods huh?
68 pieces of jewelry? Does Mr. T live there?
I smell some heavy padding going on. We all pay for crap like this. Who knows maybe Emelda Marcos does her summers there.
7:33, I know the jewelry more than likely was worn/used alot more than the handgun. My point was that if a person has the means to own 57K worth of gold, they normally purchase quality items no matter what they are shopping for. Especially an item that has the potential to save a family member from harm.
On another note. If they are padding the claim, they may try it again in the near future. I remember an individual that set fire to his house more than once for insurance money. He failed to realize that the chance of a house burning multiple times in a few years is highly unlikely.
Real stinky-All those assets and cant pony up for an alarm????
were they behind in mortgage, and credit card payments. 57,000 ...was there an alarm. we keep a few items of value, but we also have an alarm.i would run a credit check on them asap, or a mental obsersavtion.unless the house was protected by VICKS DOGS. IF IT REALLY HAPPENED, ITS SAD THAT WOULD PEOPLE TO LEAVE THAT MUCH IN A HOUSE. WERE CHILDREN RESIDING IN THE HOUSE COZ I THINK THE LAW STATES THE HANDGUNS MUST BE SECURED??
the gun was "framed"...sounds decorative only.
He is uninsured.
Post a Comment