Information Court System: DISTRICT COURT FOR WICOMICO COUNTY - CIVIL SYSTEM
Case Number: 020300052172008Claim Type:CONTRACT
District/Location Codes: 02 / 03Filing Date:07/30/2008Case Status:CLOSED
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Complaint, Judgment, and Related Persons Information
(Each Complaint, Hearing, Judgment is listed separately, along with each Related Person)
Complaint Information
Complaint No: 001(LEER, STUART) Vs:(CITY OF SALISBURY)
Type: REGULAR CLAIM
Complaint Status: DISMISSED (RULE 3-506)
Status Date: 10/28/2008Filing Date:07/30/2008Amount$1819.09Last Activity Date:10/28/2008
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Judgment Information
Judgment Type: COMPLAINT DISMISSED (RULE 3-506)Judgment Date:10/23/2008
Judgment Amount: $0.00Judgment Interest:$0.00Costs:$0.00Other Amounts:$0.00
Attorney Fees: $0.00Jointly and Severally:In Favor of Defendant:
Possession Of Property Claimed valued At: $0.00Is Awarded To The:Together With Damages Of:$0.00
Value Of Property Sued For: $0.00Plus Damages Of:$0.00Is Awarded To The:Dismissed With Prejudice:X
Replevin/Detinue Amount: $0.00
Recorded Lien Date: Judgment renewed Date:
Renewed Lien Date: Satisfaction Date:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Related Person Information
Name: PETER, MATTHEW
Connection to Complaint: ATTORNEY FOR DEFENDANT
Address: 7225 PARKWAY DR.
City: HANOVERState:MDZip Code:21076
If Person is Attorney: Attorney Code:009159Attorney's Firm:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Name: CITY OF SALISBURY
Connection to Complaint: DEFENDANT
Address: 125 N DIVISION ST
City: SALISBURYState:MDZip Code:21801
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Name: LEER, STUART
Connection to Complaint: PLAINTIFF
Address: P.O. BOX 1128
City: SALISBURYState:MDZip Code:21802
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Case History Information
(Each Event listed for the case is listed below in chronological order)
Type: INITIAL CASE FILINGComplaint No.:
Date: 07/30/2008Comment:INITIAL CASE FILING
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Type: TRIALComplaint No.:
Date: 08/25/2008Comment:TRIAL SET FOR: 10242008;TIME: 0900A;LOC:03;ROOM:02
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Type: NOTICE SENTComplaint No.:001
Date: 08/25/2008Comment:NOTICE OF INITIAL TRIAL (PLN)-D1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Type: SERVICEComplaint No.:001
Date: 09/02/2008Comment:REGL;07302008;DEF;SV-SERVED ;
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Type: NOTICE SENTComplaint No.:001
Date: 09/08/2008Comment:NOTICE OF OUTCOME OF ORIGINAL SERVICE (PLN)-A1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Type: INTENTION TO DEFEND FILEDComplaint No.:001
Date: 09/16/2008Comment:INTENTION TO DEFEND FILED /REASON FOR DEFENSE FOLLOWS
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Type: INTENTION TO DEFEND REASONComplaint No.:001
Date: 09/16/2008Comment:GROUNDS THAT THIS COURT LACKS JURISDICTION TO HEAR
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Type: INTENTION TO DEFEND REASONComplaint No.:001
Date: 09/16/2008Comment:THIS MATTER
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Type: MOTION FILEDComplaint No.:001
Date: 09/16/2008Comment:S;09302008;9U0;DEF; DSM CLAIM ;50
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Type: NOTICE SENTComplaint No.:001
Date: 09/17/2008Comment:NOTICE OF FILING OF INTENTION TO DEFEND (PLN)-B1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Type: NOTICE SENTComplaint No.:001
Date: 09/30/2008Comment:NOTICE OF OUTCOME OF MOTION FILED - 50 (PLN)-G1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Type: NOTICE SENTComplaint No.:001
Date: 09/30/2008Comment:ALSO SENT TO - ATD,
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Type: HEARING SCHEDULEDComplaint No.:001
Date: 10/01/2008Comment:HEARING ON MOTION SET;10242008;0900A;LOC03;02 ;MOTN
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Type: NOTICE SENTComplaint No.:001
Date: 10/01/2008Comment:NOTICE OF INITIAL HEARING/TRIAL - MOTN (PLN)-C2
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Type: NOTICE SENTComplaint No.:001
Date: 10/01/2008Comment:ALSO SENT TO - ATD,
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Type: DISMISSAL (RULE 3-506) ENTEREDComplaint No.:001
Date: 10/23/2008Comment:COMPLAINT DISMISSED (RULE 3-506)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Type: TRIAL DELETEComplaint No.:
Date: 10/23/2008Comment:TRIL;10242008;0900A;03;BY CLK;DISMISSAL ENTERED
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Type: NOTICE SENTComplaint No.:001
Date: 10/28/2008Comment:NOTICE OF 3-506 DISMISSAL (PLN)-T7
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Type: NOTICE SENTComplaint No.:001
Date: 10/28/2008Comment:ALSO SENT TO - ATD,
Does anybody know what happened to his case with the City???????
4 comments:
Joe:
Sounds like there was a settlement -- money paid to Mr. Leer by the City -- I think it's about that code violation case where he was his own attorney and whupped the City Attorney, Paul Wilber.
My goodness this is crazy , what's
going on? Stu is a good person ,
God knows he deserve's better.
Does Wibur get city benefits? He shouldn't he's more like a contract worker. However with the kind of contracts he writes it's hard think of what the deal may be.
About me, me and more me.
Type: DISMISSAL (RULE 3-506) ENTEREDComplaint No.:001
Date: 10/23/2008Comment:COMPLAINT DISMISSED (RULE 3-506)
Post a Comment