The country group formerly known as Lady Antebellum changed their name to Lady A last month, apologizing for "the hurt" caused by their original band moniker due to its association with "the period of history before the Civil War, which includes slavery."
But a black gospel and blues artist, Anita White—who has used the stage name Lady A for decades—protested over Lady Antebellum's decision to hijack her brand. Now, the country group is suing White to be sure they can perform as Lady A without her claiming trademark infringement.
What are the details?
The group Lady A, comprised of members Dave Haywood, Hillary Scott, and Charles Kelley, said in a statement Wednesday:
Today we are sad to share that our sincere hope to join together with Anita White in unity and common purpose has ended. She and her team have demanded a $10 million payment, so reluctantly we have come to the conclusion that we need to ask a court to affirm our right to continue to use the name Lady A, a trademark we have held for many years. It was a stirring in our hearts and reflection on our own blindspots that led us to announce a few weeks ago that we were dropping the word 'Antebellum' from our name and moving forward using only the name so many of our fans already knew us by.
According to the lawsuit obtained by Pitchfork, the band holds federally registered trademarks for the brand names "Lady Antebellum" and "Lady A," and the group "started using 'Lady A' as a source indicator for their goods and services as early as 2006-2007."
More
18 comments:
These people are all so fake and evil.
The band should just keep their original name and screw trying to appease the masses that don't listen to them!
We are going to need to say NO and knock it off
Thank you 11:34
Damn white people!!!
I agree with 11:34.
Now that the band is only relevant enough to headline rural county fairs and open for other old bands at state fairs, only the original name will sell tickets by name recognition, and posters won't have to have the parenthesized *Formerly Lady Antebellum" under the 'new' one.
Do they actually see the irony in that they changed their name because they thought it was racially insensitive, and now suing a black woman to take her name?
Seriously, you couldn’t make this up if you tried.
they should have left the name alone, so they get what they deserve, you can't get in bed with the devil and not expect to get burnt!
Who cares!
Maybe change the name to BLM sucks.
Anonymous said...
The band should just keep their original name and screw trying to appease the masses that don't listen to them!
July 11, 2020 at 11:34 PM
Amen because they lost me as one of their top fans. I will never spend another nickel on them again. Stupid a$$ White Cowards!
local boi said...
We are going to need to say NO and knock it off
July 12, 2020 at 4:39 AM
Have you said no yet or are you going to just keep posting anonymous comments on the internet!
Anonymous said...
I agree with 11:34.
Now that the band is only relevant enough to headline rural county fairs and open for other old bands at state fairs, only the original name will sell tickets by name recognition, and posters won't have to have the parenthesized *Formerly Lady Antebellum" under the 'new' one.
July 12, 2020 at 6:49 AM
Exactly!
Anonymous said...
Do they actually see the irony in that they changed their name because they thought it was racially insensitive, and now suing a black woman to take her name?
Seriously, you couldn’t make this up if you tried.
July 12, 2020 at 7:41 AM
Exactly! Bunch of DUMB MORONS!
Anonymous said...
Maybe change the name to BLM sucks.
July 12, 2020 at 8:47 AM
More like Lady A s**** off BLM protestors.
Just like the Dixie Chicks who became irrelevant when they said nasty things and attacked President Bush. Now they took "Dixie" out of their name to say just the Chicks. They are still irrelevant. Bunch of Ho's kissing ass to the wrong people.
The band owns the copyright. Done.
I wonder if their "new" record label executives put any pressure on them to change the name.
Post a Comment