New York Times is forced to revise 'bombshell' story detailing sexual misconduct claims against Brett Kavanaugh to say the accuser has NO memory of alleged assault at a dorm party in the 1980s and REFUSED to be interviewed
The New York Times has been hit with backlash for revising its 'bombshell' article describing 'new' sexual assault allegations against Brett Kavanaugh to include the fact that the alleged victim does not remember the apparent assault and declined to be interviewed about it.
The NYT published its story in the early hours of Sunday morning based on claims made by Max Stier, a former male classmate of Kavanaugh's at Yale.
Two of the newspaper's reporters - an arts writer and Wall Street reporter - discovered, from an unnamed official, that Stier reported seeing an apparent assault at a dorm party in the 1980s. He said Kavanaugh had his pants down and that his classmates then pushed his penis into a woman's hands.
They included his claim in a book they have written about Kavanaugh's college years which will be released on Tuesday.
More
4 comments:
He needs to sue for a Billion $$$
A Clinton attorney named Max Stier corroborates charges against Kavanaugh. Accuser does not even recall the incident. TALK ABOUT POLITICAL SET-UP AGAIN!!!!!! It is past time for the United States Taxpayers to stand up against the Democrat Party nickle and diming everything and wasting taxpayers money on frivolous lawsuits.
The left has no limits to their attempt to disrupt and destroy this great country...
"A Clinton attorney..."
You can stop right there, because that's where truth and credibility come to an end.
Post a Comment