Attention

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not represent our advertisers

Friday, January 27, 2017

Child Abuse?


10 comments:

Anonymous said...

Poor kid. Will end up playing dancing in the ballet and playing with Barbie.

Anonymous said...

I hope he put on clean panties that morning.

Anonymous said...


This unfortunate boy is being stalked by a helicopter parent.

While trying to gut his gender she doesn't have the decency to have him properly dressed for the weather. It's a good bet if she had a daughter the girl would not be proclaiming she was a human but that she was a strong, independent woman!

(And there is nothing wrong with strong, independent women so long as they respect strong, independent men.) That's the rub.



Anonymous said...

How stupid! No boys and girls. I suppose there are no mares and stallions, bucks and does, hens and roosters, etc. and so on. Now we're just "humans" and not any other sub-category. Maybe in some Star Trek world, but not on this planet. Maybe he'll put on his spacesuit and panties and fly away someday. And he better just "keep it in his pants" so that he doesn't get confused for a "boy" during his stay on this planet.

Anonymous said...

10:26 how is gender even relevant here? The sign is a play on the saying "boys will be boys" which is a cop-out for men doing disrespectful things. Similar to "locker room talk"

Anonymous said...

Boys will be boys, isn't a cop out on anything. Radical feminists are the only ones who think that. It means there are differences in the genders and that the differences are recognized and acknowledged. Radical feminists have blinders on, and their narrow mindedness makes them fight against acknowledging the differences. Radical feminists are anti-male. Fighting for equal rights is one thing, but fighting against males is totally another.

Anonymous said...

Snowflake in training.

Anonymous said...

Where is dad?????

Anonymous said...

Where you begin lady is get that kid under the influence of a strong ALPHA MALE.

Anonymous said...

I mean he is a boy dressed as a boy, so not sure why you would think it is referencing gender selection, rather the way men treat others.