ESPN has fired Curt Schilling. The company said that his speech went against company values because ESPN is “an inclusive company.”
What’s at stake here?
Curt Schilling has a right to say biological men don’t belong in women’s bathrooms in whatever controversial way he wants. And ESPN has a right to give Caitlyn Jenner the “Arthur Ashe Courage Award” for being a men’s sports icon who now publicly identifies as a woman. And whether we agree or disagree with Schilling’s message or ESPN’s isn’t the point.
The bigger issue is that ESPN, like any other company, has a right to control its message, which means it should be generally free to make employment decisions based on its values, not Curt Schilling’s, and certainly not the government’s.
The same is true for religious institutions, only more so. While ESPN is committed to being “inclusive,” it’s a large corporation whose main focus is reporting sports in ways that make money. Religious institutions and some family businesses, on the other hand, have more robust substantive commitments driven by faith, not profits alone.
Jewish, Christian, and Muslim schools, for example, provide comprehensive learning environments that support distinctive beliefs and distinctive worldviews. That’s why parents sacrifice to save their money to send their kids there — to avoid the secular liberal indoctrination of many government-run public schools, and to have their children formed intellectually and spiritually in keeping with their values.
So it seems all the more important that religious schools have at least the same freedom as ESPN to make employment decisions based on their sincere beliefs.
More here
4 comments:
Good point, makes perfect sense, in a sane world but it appears now we've done a one-eighty and God is no longer part of diversity!
Excellent point and I raised the same point with the performers who are not going to North Carolina because of the bathroom law. The performers believe that the law is against gay/trans people so they refuse to perform in the state. How come they are allowed to refuse service over their "beliefs" yet the baker who didn't supply the cake or the bed and breakfast owner who didn't supply the reception for gay couples because of their "beliefs" were fined thousands of dollars.
I know these instances are not EXACTLY the same but they are pretty close. It is still happening, whether at ESPN or in NC because of a person or company's beliefs and how they want to express that belief. But the Christian is not afforded that same liberty. Next they'll sue the church and the pastor who doesn't perform the wedding. Then the next thing will be "well, just close the churches if they aren't going to follow OUR agenda." You just watch and see.
And I still hold the right to tune ESPN out! No need to add to their ratings. Sure, I may miss a few games, but since I work, that happens a lot anyway!
Your right 4:59. The problem is we worship at the wrong church. The lefts church is the church of satin, the NEW AGE churches, religion of humanism, oh he was a poor deprived sexually confused child. The UN is their altar
Post a Comment