The Liberal Media's Hypocrisy on This Key Issue

It appears the full court press is on. Senate Republicans, now faced with an esteemed nominee in Merrick Garland, will be forced to slog through a coordinated campaign by liberal Democrats and their allies in the media to give Barack Obama what he wants- another liberal on the court. The press now says this is only fair, but just a few short years ago, they were singing an entirely different tune. As Townhall notes:

Senate Democrats are trying to cast Republicans as being remiss in their constitutional duty to consider Judge Merrick Garland’s nomination to the Supreme Court (they’re not). And the mainstream media, by and large, would support that false narrative. The truth is Senate Republicans are acting no differently with these nominations concerning the politics of it all. Furthermore,The New York Times editorial board didn't seem so aghast at Republican opposition back in the 1980s, where they openly said that Senate Democrats have “every right to resist” Robert Bork’s nomination:

…[T]he President [Reagan] chose Robert Bork and thus chose angry confrontation. For Judge Bork is not merely a conservative. He has long been a flamboyant provocateur, with a lifetime of writings to prove it. As a result, Mr. Reagan got the rancorous political battle he asked for. Appointment to the Court is a political act yet the Court's authority depends in large measure on public confidence in its fairness and aloofness from the political cockpit. There's something to lose when a nomination battle turns brutally partisan.

The President's supporters insist vehemently that, having won the 1984 election, he has every right to try to change the Court's direction. Yes, but the Democrats won the 1986 election, regaining control of the Senate, and they have every right to resist. This is not the same Senate that confirmed William Rehnquist as Chief Justice and Antonin Scalia as an associate justice last year.

Let this be a reminder: any time you see calls for the GOP to stop being childish, to reach across the aisle, to do the right thing, understand that Democrats are rarely, if ever, asked to do the same. and never do.


Source: AAN