Attention

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not represent our advertisers

Saturday, November 07, 2015

Hillary Clinton’s Benghazi Lies -- Marco Rubio Calls Them

Hillary Clinton’s Benghazi Defense: It Depends on What the Meaning of ‘Lied’ Is

Bill Clinton’s famous defense, “It depends upon what the meaning of the word ‘is’ is,” was not a Heideggerian musing. It was the most obvious example of the linguistic trapdoors that the Clintons regularly install to slither out of countless corners. Now, following Marco Rubio’s charge during last week’s Republican debate that Hillary Clinton lied about the Benghazi attacks, Clinton’s defenders are highlighting those escape hatches — and using them as evidence of her honesty. 

“Last week, Hillary Clinton went before a committee,” Rubio said at the debate: 

She admitted she had sent e-mails to her family saying, “Hey, this attack at Benghazi was caused by al-Qaeda-like elements.” She spent over a week telling the families of those victims and the American people that it was because of a video. And yet the mainstream media is going around saying it was the greatest week in Hillary Clinton’s campaign. It was the week she got exposed as a liar. 

The next morning Rubio faced a testy Charlie Rose, who goggled at the charge (“You called Hillary Clinton a liar, senator.”), then tried to shift the blame to fluid CIA intelligence. Rubio stood by his comments and added: “There was never, ever any evidence that [the attack] had anything to do with a video.”

More

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

No one is ever supposed to attack the liar, Hillary, but it's ok for her to attack anyone and keep on lying. Well, no, it's not ok and good for Rubio for doing so. He's the one to vote for, not the liar.