DelMarVa's Premier Source for News, Opinion, Analysis, and Human Interest Contact Publisher Joe Albero at alberobutzo@wmconnect.com or 410-430-5349
DelMarVa's Premier Source for News, Opinion, Analysis, and Human Interest Contact Publisher Joe Albero at alberobutzo@wmconnect.com or 410-430-5349
4 comments:
A day late and a dollar short.
In other words, the consumer has to pay for the incompetence of the seller.
I get it...
I'm going to have to charge double for replacement windows because I'm clumsy and keep breaking them all the time.
I thought this was a joke when I first read the headline.
The agencies of the federal government charge each other for services rendered.....this is simply another way to take each other's budgets.
They should be determining which controls failed (and why/how) to allow the breach in the first place! If an Authorizing Official accepted a risk - that's the one that should be encouraged to "be successful" elsewhere. If the risk wasn't found, documented and acknowledged during their last audit/assessment - maybe they cheap government only paid for a check-box audit instead of a risk-based assessment...or the audit team needs to be replaced.....
Meanwhile, as an IT Auditor and IT Security Professional, looks like opportunities for employment growth!
Post a Comment