A Texas high school silenced its Valedictorian’s microphone during his speech when he diverted from his pre-approved remarks and instead spoke about the Constitution.
Joshua High School graduate Remington Reimer, who was accepted into the Naval Academy, had his microphone silenced during his speech right after he told fellow graduates that school officials apparently threatened him with the move the day before, MyFoxDFW.com reported.
Colin Radford, a fellow graduate told MyFoxDFW.com that Reimer was "talking about getting constitutional rights taken away from him, and then he said "just yesterday they threatened to turn my microphone off," and then his microphone went off."
"Student speakers were told that if their speeches deviated from the prior-reviewed material, the microphone would be turned off, regardless of content," Joshua Independent School District said in a statement.
More
DelMarVa's Premier Source for News, Opinion, Analysis, and Human Interest Contact Publisher Joe Albero at alberobutzo@wmconnect.com or 410-430-5349
9 comments:
These exercises aren't included in the major pattern of initiative. Picked exercises will improve fighting capability not to mention prepare you more beneficial for an Training for mma fight.
my website - STRONA GŁÓWNA
No news here. The school did the right thing both in requiring pre approval and cutting the mic.
Are we doing the same to Muscums.
4:27, it's exasperting to see such morons, as you, making comments. It's mind-boggling to think that people, like you, are really that stupid.
I suppose during the written speech approval process the panel consisted of 4 liberals from the teachers union and a spineless PC principal all of which voted for Obama. Certainly no freedom of speech allowed about the Constitution.
4:27 is pathetic.
He'll probably lose his Academy appointment now.
Obama will see to that.
Yup and yet americans are still too stupid to see what is going on here...
4:27 Pathetic.
"Student speakers were told that if their speeches deviated from the prior-reviewed material, the microphone would be turned off, regardless of content"
He deviated from his material. What's the issue here? He didn't have to agree to the terms, but he did.
I'm not seeing any substance from you people, just irrational bashing.
Post a Comment