Attention

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not represent our advertisers

Saturday, July 14, 2012

Obama Campaign Is In Worse Shape Than It Looks

One strains, studying the entire history of presidential elections, to think of a president who was re-elected under such economic conditions as prevail in the U.S. today. Now, with June's campaign finance data trickling out, we can add the grotesque financial mismanagement of the Obama campaign as another factor counting against the president in addition to those historic headwinds.

Last time around, Mr. Obama argued that his successful management of his campaign was proof that he was up to the administrative challenges of the presidency. Now, with months of evidence to back us, his opponents can convincingly argue that, in fact, his campaign shares the defects of his administration: out-of-control spending over the long term followed not by spending reductions, but instead by a frantic search for more money, wherever it might be found.

We don't know the final numbers for June yet. But here is what we do know. The Romney campaign and the RNC, smashing records, finished the month with around $160 million in cash on hand after raising $106 million over the last month. The Obama campaign raised $71 million in June after finishing May with $109 million in cash on hand. Figuring out the Obama campaign's present cash level is a matter of simple algebra -- $109 million plus $71 million minus X, X being the amount spent in June.

More

7 comments:

Anonymous said...

Executive Privilege will dictate how much money he needs , he can print as much as he wants. Distribute it to a bailout company and get most of it or all of it as a donation. He's a slick little boy.

jeff said...

finally some GREAT news!

Anonymous said...

Financial mismanagement? That's a shocker.

Bullard Construction said...

106 million a month for a job that pays $400k a year for 4 years. Can't anyone smell CORRUPTION AND GRAFT?

Rom Paul 2012. Do not be swayed.

Anonymous said...

There are still idiots out there wanting to vote him in for another four years?

lmclain said...

Bullard! Keep rockin', my brotha!! EXACTLY what I've been saying all along! Why do so many politicians spend MIIILIONS of their own money for a job that pays peanuts? Please don't say to "serve the people", okay? I just ate breakfast and don't want to puke right away. Further, all that money is going to be wasted when Romney picks another Sarah Palin (another unheard of "nobody"). At least, Ron Paul has a backbone and knows what the words "freedom" and "liberty" actually mean, instead of just using them to start a new round of "USA! USA! USA!".

Anonymous said...

Thanks, 1058, I thought I was the only one! Actually, I've spoken with hundreds who wish they could vote for Ron Paul. I say to them, "Why not?" We're still free people THIS YEAR.