Attention

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not represent our advertisers

Wednesday, July 11, 2012

D-Day For Gun Control

Without much fanfare and as little publicity as possible, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton will go to New York City to sign the Arms Trade Treaty (ATT), now in the final stages of negotiation at the U.N. The Treaty marks the beginning of an international crusade to impose gun controls on the United States and repeal our Second Amendment rights.

The ATT is nominally to stop international arms sales to gangs, criminals, and violent groups. But, as is so often the case with U.N. treaties, this is merely a convenient facade behind which to conceal the ATT’s true intent: to force gun control on the United States.

Secretary Clinton will doubtlessly succeed in inserting language into the treaty belying this intent and asserting that the treaty in no way is to restrict our right to bear arms. But even this language will be meaningless in the face of the overall construct set up by the treaty.

More

10 comments:

Anonymous said...

she and obama and the congress should all be thrown out of office and tried for treason. thanks sjd

Anonymous said...

The United Nations is our real government. It looks after us, especially when we are too ignorant to look after ourselves. If it has determined we should not have guns then so be it. Amerikans aren't going to revolt.

Anonymous said...

They will get my ammo first!

Anonymous said...

I am not against the second amemndment and the right to bear arms, but does a person really need an automatic rifle that can fire sixtymrounds a minute? Guns like that are made for nothing but killing other people.

Anonymous said...

9:04 I use to not think we needed these type of arms ,but as this administration continues to run out of control everybody should start buying all the automatic weapons they can get there hands on its time get ready before its too late

Anonymous said...

So allow me to ask a question. If automatic guns are outlawed then does our Army have to give up theirs as well.

Anonymous said...

Automatic weapons are, and have been ,illegal for private citizens to possess for decades. Get the facts!

Anonymous said...

Well, we do have one option left, and I mean only one...

Do what those vets did int heir city that was corrupt... They held the corrupt police and politicians at gun point until they left...

This is what it will take to get our country back... Nothing less... They won't leave on their own and you cant vote out corruption... I promise you that much...

lmclain said...

These are the people who swear to REPRESENT US. The reason we NEED to bear arms is to be able to resist (and ovethrow) the weasles that seek to subjugate the people, strip them of any rights, disarm them, control the flow of information (as in "executive priviledge" and the jailing of reporters), and fail to SERVE the people. THAT, according to Thomas Jefferson. And, 9:04, my auto's fire a LOT more than "60 rounds a minute". LOL. Me and all my other friends can run off 100 or more rounds in semi-auto mode. I've asked the question before and will ask again --- do they have to actually come to your house and force you and your family onto buses (maybe shoot you just to make a point) before you OPEN YOUR EYES to what their agenda is??? They (our so called "leaders") keep us in a frenzy with who can "change things" and "turn this country around" (when they ALL are about the same thing) while in the background they are tearing the Constitution into shreds. The people need to start "voting" with 2 30 round clips taped together. Yeah. I said it. And stand by it.

Anonymous said...

Automatic weapons are NOT illegal for citizens to own. There is a lot of paperwork and a tax stamp, but it can, and has been done.