Attention

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not represent our advertisers

Saturday, January 12, 2008

STORYCHAT


Does anyone find it interesting how The Daily Times has completely, (once again) avoided ANY of the 3 pages or more comments on STORYCHAT about the Zoo, the Mayor, Joe Albero and Salisbury News?

Here they get 3 pages of comments, (mostly in my favor) in one day, (could be a record for them) and they just flat out ignore it. It is the Tilghman Times. Just when you think they're going to change their ways and get just a little more honest, they pull this crap once again.

Oh well, another Record Day for Salisbury News anyway. One would think that the DT is trying to help the Mayor but everyone knows they'll just have to come here for the real scoop. Thanks for the Front Page Coverage once again.

7 comments:

Anonymous said...

Did you see the Mayor's entry regarding the Library in the Grapevine? It stands out as an obvious plant to bolster support for her spending spree.

Anonymous said...

Looks to me you were doing most of the posting on there just not using your name!!Loser

joe albero said...

You have to REGISTER with the DT to post on there, Idiot! I can't have more than one name or access. You people are proving your paranoia each and every day.

Anonymous said...

Joe:

Don't forget that the stupid article in the DT got it started.

That one really backfired on the Barrie-Bassett conspiracy to con Salisbury residents.

Anonymous said...

They always exclude any of the story chat columns that offer logical honest criticism of the mayor and her cronies. Have to go online to the archives to see it all. But how many average Daily Times readers do that?

Anonymous said...

Saw those 3 pages of comments. There was some Nut Job on there called "Not Nuts" hysterically ranting against Campbell and Cohen, tossing Ireton in there for good measure. Full of "inside information," distortion and emotions, so my guesses were:

1. Mike Dunn
2. Lynn Cathcart
3. The Mayor herself

Seriously, this person sounded utterly unhinged!

Anonymous said...

10:53
i thot it was comyges (old no balls...err, ahh...no nuts...or...not balls..ehhh...not whatever) And whatever did campbell, cohen & ireton have to do with anything in the posts?
she/he/it (aka sh*t) was attempting to respond to a comment & got soooo far off track, it wasn't funny.
PATHETIC!