Should Comey & Lynch Be Criminally Charged?

By Thornton Crowe

Our Criminal Justice system has taken a huge hit over the last several months as we watched the Clinton Email investigation farce play out in the media. For months, we all heard about how FBI Director Jams Comey would resign should the Department of Justice refused to criminally indict Hillary Clinton for her removal of classified information from the government's secured system to a home brewed server, vulnerable to hackers both foreign and domestic - which is a clear violation of laws. However, on July 5th after Attorney General Loretta Lynch's clandestine meeting with former president Bill Clinton on an Arizona tarmac, he announced that he would not recommend charges.

Click to Enlarge

Over the months that followed, much evidence of a coverup has surfaced regarding the sham investigation that took place - some evidence is even generated by the FBI and then sent to Congress. For example, the Platte River employee, Paul Combetta, broadcasted on Reddit, looking for a way to scrub a "Very VP" email address out of his client's database/metafiles and was also give immunity. And, of course, we all know about the BleachBit and the hammered cellphones, but what many of you might not know is emails between Platte and Clinton's tech staff referred to the situation as the "Hillary's Coverup Operation."

Click to Enlarge

Last Thursday, even when representatives had him dead to rights regarding the law and new evidence of a coverup, Comey doubled (and tripled) down on the apparent missteps and legally illogical immunity deals while testifying before the Judicial Oversight Committee. It got so heated, Rep. John Ratcliffe from Texas even said on record, he didn't believe Comey ever intended on recommending charges long before the investigation ended - a sentiment many feel in both Congress and public opinion. Thus, the whole Clinton crime and subsequent coverup proves without doubt now, we have a double standard legal system - one for the rich and politically aligned and one for the rest of us.

Actual exchange between Director Comey and Rep. Ratcliffe during Sept. 29th Hearing.

Therefore, here's the question of the day:

Do you think James Comey and Loretta Lynch should be criminally charged (and removed from their posts) for their participation in this obvious coverup in the Clinton Email Investigation?

How say you.

Political Fodder or Dangerous Reality?

By Thornton Crowe

Why does some think it's such a big deal? It's only about email... Right?

The Republicans are just in a witch hunt, it's really not that big of a deal!

One thing that has been particularly disturbing about the public shrug off towards Hillary Clinton's email scandal is this:

Does the general public really understand just what it all meant?

With Democrats running subversive tactics to shield the ugly truth while trying to make Republicans look like they're on some Agatha Christie Witch Hunt, it's no wonder many Americans allotting a whole hour for news a day, will not fully grasp the deal behind the deal of this scandal. It's easy to fall prey to Megyn Kelly telling you 'it's only politics', but it goes so much deeper than mere politics. It actually goes as deep as Clinton Cash, where the onion layers are so many, it's hard to peel in 20 minutes or less.

We can all sit around and hypothesize whether or not Clinton possessed a criminal intent, but it still doesn't erase the cold-hard facts. By placing top secret emails on an unsecured, undocumented private home-brew server, she is telling Americans she's dangerous, bent on selling out America. Her own lies about said SERVERS and DEVICES (plural and emphasized) are indicative of what we call, Guilty Knowledge. Meaning, she knew what she did was illegal and tried to conceal it from Congress, but more importantly, you, the American voters.

With this article, I task you to investigate the reality behind the hyperbole and decide for yourself if this is really what you would deem presidential behavior.

If you take the time to really process what this says, you'll quickly see this has nothing to do with political parties or some big, mystical Right Wing Conspiracy. There's some real concerns - no, evidence indicating we should be worried for our safety.

It's four easy points, you can't afford to ignore.

Disturbing Precedent...

By Thornton Crowe

Yes, it's taken me a full day to recover from my shock and dismay about James Comey's the nonsensical statements yesterday that's sent the country into yet another tizzy. I have to admit, not knowing him on any personal level, many of his friends and colleagues are people I've long held in high esteem. He has been described as a true advocate of the Law. A hard-nosed, no nonsense guy who brings criminal to bear for their criminality.

Therefore, as you can imagine, I was more than shocked after his set-up for recommendations that turned bad when he stated no charges would be filed against Hillary Clinton for her grossly negligent handling of our State secrets.

Was it really a good day for Hillary Clinton?

When one really examines his verb, he damned Clinton; showing her as incompetent, unreliable and unethical as well as extremely careless (which is legal synonymous with gross negligence -- written verbatim in the laws she broke!) For those purposes, he eviscerated her character and proved her unfit for the office as President of the United States. Let's face it, now, if she were to apply for a file clerk job at the DOJ, she couldn't gain security clearance because of what he read from his report. How can a person be a president without being able to have security clearance?