At present, there is no vaccine for the coronavirus. That means that one of the two paths to immunity is blocked. The other path is“herd immunity,” in which a critical mass of infection occurs in lower-risk populations that ultimately thwarts transmission.
Herd immunity is the only path that is currently available. Let that sink in for a minute. The only way our species can effectively resist the infection is through the development of specific antibodies or sensitized white blood cells. In other words, the only way we can lick this thing is by the majority of the population getting the infection and thereby developing immunity to future outbreaks.
That being the case, one would assume that the government’s policy would try to achieve herd immunity in the least painful way possible.
(Young, low-risk people should go back to work if they so choose.)
But that is not the government’s policy, in fact, the government’s policy is the exact opposite. US policy encourages people to remain at home and self quarantine until the government decides to lift the lockdown and allow some people to return to work. This policy assumes that the infection will have vanished by then, which of course, is extremely unlikely. The more probable outcome is that– when people return to work– there will be another surge in cases and another spike in deaths. We will have shifted the curve to a future date without having flattened it. We will have inflicted catastrophic damage on the economy and gained nothing. This is an idiotic policy that goes nowhere.
After 6 weeks of this nonsense, many people are getting fed-up and demanding that the lockdowns be ended. In response to the public outcry, many governors are planning to restart their economies and lift the restrictions. What this means, is that, after wasting a month and half on a failed strategy, many states are ready to follow in Sweden’s footsteps with one critical difference, they’re not going to have a team of crack epidemiologists carefully monitoring their social interactions to see if a wave of new Covid cases is going to overwhelm the health care system. That means that things could get out of hand fast, and I expect they will. As we said in last week’s column, the lockdowns must be lifted gradually, that is crucial.
“You have to step down the ladder one rung at a time”, says Senior Swedish epidemiologist and former Chief Scientist of the European Center for Disease Prevention and Control, Johan Giesecke. In other words, slowly ease up on the restrictions and gradually allow people to get back to work. That is the best way forward.
There is also the question of whether herd immunity will be sufficient to fight off reinfection. This question was posed to Giesecke in a recent interview in which he was asked:
“Why are you gambling that herd immunity will protect your people from re-infection?”
Giesecke answered,
6 comments:
Open everything as normal, the sooner the better
Sweden is the size of Maryland.
Open it up! Or you'll have Marshall Law on your hands.
This is what people fail to realize.
How's that 6:31, please explain, people are already traveling as normal. Open all the stores which will spread the crowds out. Walmart can then get their shelves stocked.
So where's the mantra that if laws "save just one life, it will be worth it", like with seat belts and drinking and driving laws? Now we have folks that are proposing that losing a few, or many lives for that matter, is worth it. A lot of rationalizing the immoral stance of not protecting the vulnerable.
Post a Comment