Attention

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not represent our advertisers

Monday, May 13, 2019

It's not just cyber attacks and missile testing

Since Sept. 11, 2001, analysts have been increasingly concerned terrorists might steal, buy, build, or be given a nuclear weapon—and the War on Terrorism would become a nuclear war. The Department of Homeland Security’s National Planning Scenario #1 is detonation of a 10-kiloton nuclear weapon, as powerful as the Hiroshima bomb, in a location such as New York City or Washington, D.C.

Many experts warn an act of nuclear terrorism is not a question of if, but when.

Until the recent protracted nuclear crisis with North Korea, relatively less attention has been paid to the increasing possibility of nuclear war between nations. India and Pakistan are widely regarded as the most likely candidates for a nuclear conflict between states.

Although North Korea, Russia, and China have all made nuclear threats against the United States recently, in the case of North Korea and Russia repeatedly, most analysts dismiss these as mere “bluster” and “nuclear sabre rattling” not to be taken seriously.

One day, perhaps soon, this may well prove to be a fatal mistake for millions.

There is now a real possibility of knocking out the electric grid in the USA with an EMP attack and Trump has ordered feds to be prepared for it.

More


[Dr. Peter Vincent Pry is chief of staff of the Congressional EMP Commission. He served on the staff of the House Armed Services Committee and at the CIA. ]

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

If we believe the official story of 911, then there is no reason whatsoever to assume the US Government is capable or willing to protect American People.

It is a behemoth failure.

Dudes with box cutters brought the Country to its knees using instructions from a mastermind in an Afghanistan cave all while he was hooked up to a dialysis machine.

Epic failure

Anonymous said...

United States was not brought down to its knees