The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not represent our advertisers

Wednesday, May 29, 2019

Clarence Thomas Exposes Abortion's Ties to Racist Eugenics in Scathing Fetal Remains Case Opinion

On Tuesday, the Supreme Court refused to take up the issue of Indiana's ban on abortion specifically for the sex, race, or disability of the baby to be killed. Justice Clarence Thomas wrote a powerful opinion revealing the connections between the racist eugenics movement and the abortion movement. He warned that if Planned Parenthood is able to get sex-selective, race-specific, and disability-targeted abortions codified as a woman's right under the Constitution, that would enshrine a horrific movement rightly left in the past.

"Enshrining a constitutional right to an abortion based solely on the race, sex, or disability of an unborn child, as Planned Parenthood advocates, would constitutionalize the views of the 20th-century eugenics movement," Thomas warned. "In other contexts, the Court has been zealous in vindicating the rights of people even potentially subjected to race, sex, and disability discrimination."

Yet abortion activists argue that Roe v. Wade (1973) was correct in ruling that abortion is a fundamental right for women. They claim that this right should override any other concerns, even race, sex, and disability discrimination applied to an unborn baby.

Thomas condemned this abortion argument, showing how it echoes the disgusting eugenics movement. He argued that the Indiana law "and other laws like it promote a State's compelling interest in preventing abortion from becoming a tool of modern-day eugenics."



Anonymous said...

Clarence Thomas for President!

Anonymous said...

Well the leftist female argument is her body her decision. Well if that child is born in a botch abortion, they still want it dead. Well if that child is born it does not need the mother for oxygen to breath. That child then falls under a US citizen. It has a right to life liberty and the pursuit of happiness. If she wants to abort after 6 months then a induced labor should be given and the child taken. She didn’t want it right? Life liberty and the pursuit of happiness given a chance to that child! She will no longer have responsibilities of it as if it had been killed.

Anonymous said...

I could care less without modern health care the poor and malnourished dim witted and futile would spontaneously abort any way.

Anonymous said...

Thank you Justice Thomas - now can we stop the slaughter.

Anonymous said...

Everyone has an opinion..right wrong indifferent. At the end of the day it's still a choice. Take away choice, then we live in a dictatorship with Government rule. Believe history shows we left Britain because of this.