A little remembered event that occurred 538 years ago today – the ritual decapitation of 800 Christians who refused Islam – sheds much light on modern questions concerning the ongoing conflict between Islam and the West.
Context: Though primarily remembered for sacking Constantinople in 1453, because Ottoman sultan Mehmed II was only twenty-one years old then, he still had many good decades of jihading before him. He continued expanding into the Balkans, and, in his bid to feed his horses on the altar of Saint Peter's basilica – Muslim prophecies held that "we will conquer Constantinople before we conquer Rome" – he invaded Italy and captured Otranto in 1480. More than half of its twenty-two thousand inhabitants were massacred, five thousand led away in chains.
To demonstrate his magnanimity, Mehmed offered freedom and security to 800 chained Christian captives. All they had to do was embrace Islam. Instead, they unanimously chose to act on the words of one of their numbers: "My brothers, we have fought to save our city; now it is time to battle for our souls!"
Outraged that his invitation was spurned, on August 14, on a hilltop (subsequently named "Martyr's Hill"), Mehmed ordered the ritual decapitation of these 800 unfortunates. Their archbishop was slowly sawed in half to jeers and triumphant cries of "Allah akbar!" (The skulls and bones of some of these defiant Christians were preserved and can still be seen in the Cathedral of Otranto.)
Now consider what this event says about current realities.
More
3 comments:
Let me tell you how I see this "reality", contrary to the author.
This is horrible, no doubt. 800 killed refusing to convert to Islam. What does this story tell us?
Just as the inquisition was horrible... 32,000 executions of those refusing to convert to Christianity.
So... when I look at this, the "reality" as I see it is this:
Good men do good things, bad men do bad things... but to get good men to do bad things, you need religion.
Religion is the problem. Both Islam and Christianity have had extremists and extreme times, moderates and peace times... but a lot of that is due to socioeconomic & political circumstances.
As an atheist, I find all religion troubling and problematic. America protects religious liberty.. without exception, so how do we deal with this? I'm not sure I know.. I'm certainly open to suggestions.
We could debate which side is "more" evil... but does it really matter... when what is evil and immoral is still evil & immoral? Neither is good for us... at either metric, higher or lower...
When one groups "freedom fighter" is the other "terrorist" and vise-a-versa... all I can see, the "reality", is that you are all dangerous. ESPECIALLY when neither party has a shred of compelling evidence for the validity of their claims.... that have been used to justify countless of executions.
So the "reality", is that the problem is religion.
The gay atheist rises again.
@Imclain
I'm so flattered I never knew you were so sweet on me.
And as usual no substance or attention to content, just adhominem attacks... but are you slipping up? Shocked now strawmen.
Post a Comment