Liberals seem to be genuinely concerned about “fake news” when it comes from small conservative-run blogs, but what about the blatant lies that come from “trusted” sources like those in the mainstream media?
The silence is deafening.
The Wall Street Journal did a Q&A piece regarding President Obama’s disgraceful visit to Pearl Harbor with Prime Minister Shinzo Abe.
The Federalist Papers Project reported on the disgusting misrepresentation of reality and it will leave you shaking your head and wondering who you can really trust. They covered the first question answered, regarding whether Abe was the first Japanese leader to visit Pearl Harbor since the deadly attack in 1941.
According to the WSJ coverage, Abe was the first Prime Minister to visit Pearl Harbor with a United States President and visit the USS Arizona memorial, which commemorated the American sailors and Marines killed in the Japanese attack.
The next question asked, “was there some confusion about that,” to which WSJ explained that Japanese officials mistakenly put forward Abe’s trip as a first for a sitting Japanese leader since WWII.
Not long after, media reports came to the fore from the 1950s which showed that, in fact, three Japanese prime ministers made visits to Pearl Harbor during that decade, including Prime ministers Shigeru Yoshida, Ichiro Hatoyama, and Nobusuke Kish, Abe’s grandfather.
WSJ reported about what the Japanese prime ministers did during their visits:
More
DelMarVa's Premier Source for News, Opinion, Analysis, and Human Interest Contact Publisher Joe Albero at alberobutzo@wmconnect.com or 410-430-5349
2 comments:
Pearl Harbor was a false flag attack to get the US into the evil fake war in Europe. The information has been declassified by the US government. They want us to know the truth. Evil Freemasons orchestrated the murder of thousands of lives here, and millions of lives abroad to serve the Israel agenda. The Sabatean Rothschild Family is evil to its core, and they control the information we receive including in schools.
December 30, 2016 at 12:30 PM
It wasn't a "false flag". A false flag is when we attack ourselves and blame it on others. We had the information about the attack before it happened and for whatever reason, that info did not make it to the ones who mattered in time. So it could be said we "allowed" the attack to happen. Similar and had the same effect, but no.
Post a Comment