Climate Central just ran this piece, which the Washington Post picked up on. They claimed the US was “overwhelmingly hot” in 2016, and temperatures have risen 1,5°F since the 19th century.
The first problem with their analysis is that the US had very little hot weather in 2016. The percentage of hot days was below average, and ranked 80th since 1895. Only 4.4% of days were over 95°F, compared with the long term average of 4.9%. Climate Central is conflating mild temperatures with hot ones.
They also claim US temperatures rose 1.5°F since the 19th century, which is what NOAA shows.
The problem with the NOAA graph is that it is fake data. NOAA creates the warming trend by altering the data. The NOAA raw data shows no warming over the past century.
More
7 comments:
This is what happens when you have billionaire elitists who want to become trillionaires and put the 99.9% of us in poverty.
Fatting frogs for snakes!!
What would be viable would be accurately siting reporting locations and then collecting the data over an extended period of time. In other words, actual science.
We 'know' weather varies over both the short and long haul. Go visit the Finger Lakes gouged by the glaciers, as an example.
A cold or hot day, or season, or year is not conclusive; it's just more data to be folded into the average.
The charlatans have corrupted the process and we are justified in being skeptical about what they offer as 'facts'.
Let's do it right and then react.
Global warming is a tax scam.
NOAA is a government agency and everyone knows the government would never lie to us, especially the Democrats.
NOAA uses weather models and satellites owned by Rothschild Family.
Mars is warming also, gess thats humanity doing that ?
Post a Comment