Attention

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not represent our advertisers

Sunday, February 14, 2016

When Convicts Go To College

Higher Education In Prisons Is A Good Deal 

For Everyone, Inmate And Advocate Says

America spends $80 billion a year keeping criminals behind bars, but research has shown that cost could be reduced by making one thing more accessible to inmates – education.

“We spend all that money on incarceration, but have little to show for it,” says Christopher Zoukis (www.ChristopherZoukis.com), a prison-education advocate and author of “College for Convicts: The Case for Higher Education in American Prisons” (McFarland & Co., 2014) and “Prison Education Guide” (Prison Legal News Publishing, 2016).

“It’s time for this money to be put to good use by helping to reform prisoners so they can return to their communities as productive, law-abiding members of society.”

Giving inmates the opportunity to earn college degrees can be a hard sell, though, because the average taxpayer is more concerned with educating their own children and grandchildren than with educating prison inmates, Zoukis says.

They want to see prisoners punished, not put on a track toward a degree, but that’s short-sighted, he says.

“Most of the public is unaware that educating prisoners can have an impact – a positive one – on our economy and on the safety of our communities,” Zoukis says.

Here’s how: Prisoners who take classes while incarcerated have a 13 percent lower likelihood of committing another offense and ending up back behind bars, according to a Rand Corp. study in 2014 that reviewed years of data. Those prisoners also are more likely to become employed once they are released.

The Rand report says that for every $1 spent on correctional education, there was a $5 reduction in overall corrections spending.

Right now, though, a high school diploma or the GED equivalent is as far as prisoners can go in most prisons across the country, says Zoukis, who is incarcerated at the Federal Correctional Institution Petersburg in Virginia, a medium-security facility.

“It’s better than nothing, and will reduce recidivism, but a GED isn’t going to qualify someone for anything other than an entry-level job,” Zoukis says. “The further we can go beyond that, the higher the level of education we can bring into prisons, the greater the chances are that an ex-prisoner will have an economically stable life and won’t be a repeat offender.”

Zoukis has worked on his own college degree from Adams State University in Colorado via correspondence. He expects to earn a bachelor’s degree by the end of 2016 and hopes to have an MBA by the time he is released from prison in 2018.

But Zoukis has faced roadblocks on the way to working toward a degree, and he believes changes need to happen to make the path smoother for those who will follow him. Among the steps Zoukis says are necessary:

• Support from prison culture and staff. Zoukis says he has seen that in some cases, prison guards and other staff members discourage education for inmates. “Prison education won’t work unless we have institutional commitment to ensure a culture of support for education in the state and federal prison systems,” he says. GED programs, vocational training and access to college courses all need to be promoted. Prison authorities need to prohibit guards and prison staff from refusing to grant release from work details to prisoners enrolled in any educational or college program, Zoukis says.
• Eligibility for Pell grants. Prisoners should again be made eligible for Pell grants and other need-based student financial aid, Zoukis says. Inmates were banned from using Pell grants in 1994, but President Obama has announced a pilot program in which a limited number of prisoners would be able to use the grants beginning in the fall. That’s a start, but Zoukis wants to see that eligibility become more widespread.
• Partnerships with community colleges. Community colleges are valuable allies in the effort to educate prisoners, but in many cases the programs offered are limited to basic education, literacy and non-credit vocational programs, and often they are taught by prison staff rather than qualified instructors, Zoukis says. “What is needed are more of the credited vocational and advanced academic programs,” he says. The programs also need to be adequately funded, he says.

Ultimately, it’s time for the nation to decide what is more important: mass incarceration or public education, Zoukis says. Prisons need to be used for more than punishment. Instead, he says, they need to be seen as treatment and education centers where skills can be learned and problems addressed.

“The end goal of corrections is enhanced public safety,” Zoukis says. “It’s not enhanced punishment for punishment’s sake.”

About Christopher Zoukis

Christopher Zoukis, author of “College for Convicts: The Case for Higher Education in American Prisons” (McFarland & Co., 2014) and “Prison Education Guide” (Prison Legal News Publishing, 2016), is a leading expert in the field of correctional education. He is the founder of www.PrisonEducation.com and www.PrisonLawBlog.com, and is a contributing writer to The Huffington Post and Prison Legal News. He is incarcerated at the medium-security Federal Correctional Institution Petersburg in Virginia.

18 comments:

Anonymous said...

You can take it from the “Horses” mouth. I was incarcerated for 3 ½ years. Started college while in and then finished when I got out. I truly don’t think I would have ever gone if not for starting while doing time. I had never been in any kind of trouble before and have not since. The icing on the cake…I have worked for a state agency for over 15 years. A little investment can go a long way.

Concerned Retiree said...

That information is BS. A lot go for the money and good days. As for as college it is a waste of money and they never use the college education when they get out. Spend that college money for the Kids, never incarcerated, who went to school, not a GED, who wants the knowledge and knows how to study to earn their way by not be incarcerated. Md took it away because it was not cost effective for the Prison system only for the colleges and created more unnecessary problems for the Staff.

Anonymous said...

do you know what rehabilitation means 446?

Anonymous said...

Problem is, these folks now come out of prison with degrees they can't use due to the crimes they have committed...yet they are smarter than some of the people that will get selected to fill vacancies they interview for.

The education needs to center around jobs and positions they actually can fill - not raising their hopes with unreal dreams.

Anonymous said...

4:37 - you are fortunate - but it does show that government agencies have a lower standard in order to fill a quota.

Anonymous said...

Anonymous Anonymous said...
4:37 - you are fortunate - but it does show that government agencies have a lower standard in order to fill a quota.

February 9, 2016 at 6:18 PM

he is college educated and that makes him a lower standard? do you even have your ged?

Rebel Without a Clue said...

I think that all that everyone should look at the disciplinary system of the US Disciplinary Barracks at Ft. Leavenworth. Their rate of recidivism is around 3% from what I recall. The inmates will come out with at least a GED and they have hiring personnel who place inmates in jobs back in the inmates home area. It has been a long time since I have been to Ft. Leavenworth (mid-90's after Desert Storm) but it was an interesting place.

I am sure that the states do something similar but I have no first-hand knowledge of their processes.

Anonymous said...

I am sure that the states do something similar but I have no first-hand knowledge of their processes.

February 9, 2016 at 6:58 PM

the states don't do a whole lot per se as far as I know, but my info is dated. The federal system had a much lower recidivism rate that states do because they educate them and realize people go to prison AS punishment versus FOR punishment.

The continuing practice of punishment on top of punishment, even after released and paid their debt to society is one of the factors driving the recidivism rates. It's a vicious cycle once someone gets into the justice system, regardless of their crime or whether or not they are guilty. Sometimes a mere accusation can ruin someone's life.

And with the thousands upon thousands of nonsensical laws on the books, anyone can be caught up in it. The "free" country of the USA locks up more people than any other country in the world, including communist nations.

Prison is a profit driven big business. They like the repeat business and have no incentive to lessen the rate of returning 'customers'.

Anonymous said...

DO NOT take the FIRST money offered thru Pell Grants as was done in the past to educated inmates. I have no problem with, and in fact support inmate education.

I AM TOTALLY AGAINST giving money to inmates before first time graduating students.

DO NOT REWARD BAD BEHAVIOR.


Anonymous said...

6:50 - lower standard - yes hiring someone in to a position of trust and responsibility after showing they don't deserve it by committing a crime!

College degree - without a criminal record!

Anonymous said...

This is 4:37. First I would like to say thank you to 4:46 and 5:59. It is nice that someone understands. To 6:18 and, I started out with an entry level position and am now a supervisor. I have worked my way up with a lot of hard work. They lower standards to meet their quota? What quota? I am a white female. Some of you just can’t admit that someone can do better for themselves. I just wonder how many skeletons you have in your closet and how much time you would have done if caught for all of the illegal things you have done. Can a person not make a mistake? I am sure glad that you are not God and I pray that He forgives you for not being compassionate. Have a blessed day.

Anonymous said...

Next you will have people committing crimes and pleading guilty just to get free college educations.

Anonymous said...

Anonymous Anonymous said...
Next you will have people committing crimes and pleading guilty just to get free college educations.

February 10, 2016 at 10:31 AM

omg. you are in dire need of any education.

Anonymous said...

Anonymous Anonymous said...
6:50 - lower standard - yes hiring someone in to a position of trust and responsibility after showing they don't deserve it by committing a crime!

College degree - without a criminal record!

February 10, 2016 at 8:38 AM

a lot of people would be out of work if society went by your 'standards'.

Anonymous said...

In Maryland the degree isn't the problem. It is the idiot Democrats that gave inmates still serving time the right to vote for their crooked butts. Maryland has gone to the dogs.
Most of us are looking for a way out of here.

Anonymous said...

Awesome story, that's how it is supposed to work. Those who truly want to make positive changes in their lives, and have the ability to do so, are worth investing a second chance.

Anonymous said...

Good for you. Some people are worth rehabilitating, though some are not. And if it was a "drug crime" there's not necessarily much "rehabilitation" to it, as long as addiction is not an issue. It's just a matter of changing people, places and things. Good luck to you.

Anonymous said...

That's like saying people cut off their own legs just to get free handicapped parking.