Attention

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not represent our advertisers

Wednesday, August 28, 2013

Congress Should Veto Obama’s war

“Congress doesn’t have a whole lot of core responsibilities,” said Barack Obama last week in an astonishing remark.

For in the Constitution, Congress appears as the first branch of government. And among its enumerated powers are the power to tax, coin money, create courts, provide for the common defense, raise and support an army, maintain a navy and declare war.

But, then, perhaps Obama’s contempt is justified.

For consider Congress’ broad assent to news that Obama has decided to attack Syria, a nation that has not attacked us and against which Congress has never authorized a war.

Why is Obama making plans to launch cruise missiles on Syria?

According to a “senior administration official … who insisted on anonymity,” President Bashar al-Assad used chemical weapons on his own people last week in the two-year-old Syrian civil war.

But who deputized the United States to walk the streets of the world pistol-whipping bad actors? Where does our imperial president come off drawing “red lines” and ordering nations not to cross them?

Neither the Security Council nor Congress nor NATO nor the Arab League has authorized war on Syria.

Who made Barack Obama the Wyatt Earp of the Global Village?

Moreover, where is the evidence that WMDs were used and that it had to be Assad who ordered them? Such an attack makes no sense.

More

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

Agree 100% with this. Look at the interviews of the locals who were eyewitnesses. They know Obama is to blame.

ginn said...

If Congress and law-enforcement would just go after and charge those who carry out this tyrant's orders, we could stop his blatant disregard of the law.
I just can't understand how our Congress, our law makers, can sit idly by and allow these oversteps of the law.