The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not represent our advertisers
Friday, June 29, 2012
BREAKING NEWS: Justice Department Says It Won't Prosecute Holder
Justice Department says in letter obtained by Fox News it won't prosecute Attorney General Eric Holder after the GOP-led House voted to hold him in criminal contempt of Congress.
From Fox News
11 comments:
Anonymous
said...
Why? It's going to get worse. Our Government is out of control.
Time to overthrow the Government. It will not be televised, and the internet will be down, so plan for that. Paper noted via horse again will win. No GPS tracking. It;s gonna be old school, but lets get it on.
5:39 You think it is a waste of tax payers money? You don't think we have a right to know WHY the justice dept put 1000's of guns in the hands of the violent drug cartels? And what was their reasoning for doing so? And why the justice dept is against letting law biding US citizens have guns but have no problem putting them in the hands of known killers and those whose lifestyle are violent and can kill innocent Mexican citizens (and US in this case) and children in a heartbeat?
4:20-----"Actually there is an article by Fortune that states otherwise" States otherwise what? And you "really" don't think the Jus Dept is against law biding citizens having guns? Think again---
Eric Holder worked under Janet Reno during the Clinton admin. He co-signed on an amicus brief in DC v. Heller. The brief was filed in support of DC's ban on ALL handguns. When the COA ruled that DC's handgun ban was unconstitutional Holder was very outspoken in his belief that the court was wrong and handguns should be banned-everywhere. Holder has expressed many times an absolute opposition to private gun ownership.
11 comments:
Why? It's going to get worse. Our Government is out of control.
Of course it won't. Would Clyde Barrow prosecute Bonnie Parker?
Birds of a feather...... you know the rest!
Of course it shouldn't. This is another waste of taxpayers money.
Time to overthrow the Government. It will not be televised, and the internet will be down, so plan for that. Paper noted via horse again will win. No GPS tracking. It;s gonna be old school, but lets get it on.
539PM...sounds like another liberal I just happen to know.
Liberal or not, this is a waste. Lying about the man should be punishable somehow.
How about signing a jobs act which is much more important.
Wow, I'm surprised. not. Never thought they would.map
5:39 You think it is a waste of tax payers money? You don't think we have a right to know WHY the justice dept put 1000's of guns in the hands of the violent drug cartels? And what was their reasoning for doing so?
And why the justice dept is against letting law biding US citizens have guns but have no problem putting them in the hands of known killers and those whose lifestyle are violent and can kill innocent Mexican citizens (and US in this case) and children in a heartbeat?
Anon 7:12am
Actually there is an article by Fortune that states otherwise.
I really don't think the Justice Department is against law abiding US citizens having guns. That's more garbage coming from certain people.
And innocent peopl get killed regardless in the drug war. They always have.
4:20-----"Actually there is an article by Fortune that states otherwise" States otherwise what? And you "really" don't think the Jus Dept is against law biding citizens having guns? Think again---
Eric Holder worked under Janet Reno during the Clinton admin. He co-signed on an amicus brief in DC v. Heller. The brief was filed in support of DC's ban on ALL handguns.
When the COA ruled that DC's handgun ban was unconstitutional Holder was very outspoken in his belief that the court was wrong and handguns should be banned-everywhere. Holder has expressed many times an absolute opposition to private gun ownership.
Post a Comment