Attention

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not represent our advertisers

Monday, June 27, 2011

Can Ron Paul Really Be Right About Everything?

I was in Jacksonville last Friday for an event called “Ron Paul on the River.” The Republican presidential candidate was supposed to speak at a luncheon after appearing at another area event in the morning, but had to cancel at the last minute due to votes on Libya in the House scheduled on short notice. While it was disappointing that the congressman would not appear, the keynote speaker that appeared in his place was well worth the trip.

Doug Wead is a self-confessed former member of the Establishment. In addition to being a best-selling author and world-renowned speaker, Wead has worked as a special advisor to President George H.W. Bush and on the campaign of George W. Bush. According to Wikipedia, Time magazine called Wead “an insider in the Bush family orbit.”

A good portion of Wead’s speech in Jacksonville focused on issues on which he had formerly disagreed with Paul. At one point, he made the startling statement, “but now I agree with him on everything.” He encouraged Paul supporters to persevere through the difficulties of supporting an anti-Establishment candidate and to remember that “logic and the truth are on your side.”

It is not fashionable to admit that you agree with anyone “on everything.” To make that admission is to invite accusations of belonging to a personality cult whose members blindly follow their leader no matter what position he takes. Indeed, this criticism is leveled at Paul’s grassroots supporters, who are called “Paulites” by detractors, implying that they have a pseudo-religious devotion to Paul rather than informed positions on the issues.

In modern America political thinking, where only the results of political action are considered rather than the rights of the parties involved, it is not considered reasonable to agree with anyone 100% of the time. For someone like Wead, whose living depends upon his credibility as an expert on those things he writes and speaks about, there is a certain amount of risk in making this statement. Yet he did it in Jacksonville without hesitation, emphasizing the words “on everything” to ensure that no one missed the point.

This immediately struck me, because it was the second time in as many weeks that I had heard a statement like this from someone who had something to lose by saying it. Appearing on The O’Reilly Factor, John Stossel answered O’Reilly’s assertion that Ron Paul hadn’t won the New Hampshire debate by saying, “But he’s right about everything and you’re wrong.” O’Reilly retorted, “Everything?” Stossel repeated, “Everything.” When O’Reilly pressed yet again with the same question, Stossel finally backed up to “Just about everything.”

More

8 comments:

Anonymous said...

He could because, Obama is certainly wrong about everything

Anonymous said...

Don't care for a lot of Ron Pauls views. But he is a strict constitutionalist and this country really could use someone that would help the country get back to the basics. Those things that made this country great. He could be the man for the job to tell George Soros and his type to pack sand and move to Europe if they don't like it.

Anonymous said...

I've never voted republican before (or democrat) and i've voted in at least 5 presidential elections, but if ron paul is on the ballad for the general election, he will get my vote.

Anonymous said...

ballot, dummy

wasted vote. . .good for me though

i'm voting for Obama

:o) you can thank me later

Anonymous said...

you're voting for obama? I'd say you are the dummy, dummy. You must really want this country to become a socialist dictatorship. You almost made it happen after the last election. Not again.

Anonymous said...

Socialist dictatorship? I am pretty sure when you wake up tomorrow you can go do whatever you wanna do.

Anonymous said...

Yeah, Socialism is just terrible. . .but there sure are a lot of Republicans who like their social security and Medicare. . .Socialized programs. . .even Newt said Paul Ryan's plan was too extreme in killing Medicare. . .right wing social engineering I believe he calls the Ryan plan. . .Romney dodged questions regarding his support for the Ryan plan. . .he has his "own plan". . .yet he once created his own form of "Obama care". . .so I guess you conservatives like Socialism. . .as long as it benefits you. Hmmmmmmmmm . . .you know in Europe there is a Socialist party . . .just like we have Republicans and Democrats in the US. . .its not a bad thing. . .many European countries are far more prosperous than the USA is now. . .we have been enjoying the benefits of Socialism for decades. We are all Socialists now. WAKE UP!!! hahaha

:o)

Anonymous said...

Hopefully the Ron Paul will get the nomination. Conservatives as a whole won't come out for Romney. The rest of the pack of possible nominees are toxic, and won't be able to court any blue dogs or the huge independent vote. Ron Paul can do both.


Socialism works great until you run out of other peoples money to spend-M. Thatcher