"We commend lawmakers in Maryland for passing this raft of legislation to protect animals from cruelty and abuse," said Tami Santelli, director of state legislation for The HSUS. "The anti-cruelty laws of a state are a reflection of our basic values and attitudes toward animals, and this collection of bills is a measurable step forward for the state of Maryland."
The General Assembly passed the following bills during their 90-day session:
- Senate Bill 839, sponsored by Sen. Lisa Gladden, D-Baltimore City, which requires commercial dog breeders to be licensed by the county in which they operate, and requires counties to report basic information about these commercial breeders once a year to the Maryland Department of Labor, Licensing and Regulation. While most states have statewide licensing systems for commercial dog breeders, Maryland does not. This bill, once signed into law, will provide critical information to understand the scope of the puppy mill situation in the state. Companion legislation, H.B. 940, was introduced by Del. Tom Hucker, D-Montgomery County.
- Senate Bill 639, sponsored by Sen. Joanne Benson, D-Prince George’s County, which will set up a task force to study the need for funding of spay and neuter programs in Maryland. Each year in Maryland shelters, an estimated 48,000 homeless dogs and cats are euthanized – that’s 5 animals each hour. Affordable, accessible spay/neuter programs can help prevent this tragedy. Thirty-four states and the District of Columbia have a public funding mechanism to subsidize the cost of spay/neuter surgeries for those who cannot afford it. The task force will be comprised of representatives from animal control, humane societies, non-profit spay/neuter organizations, the Maryland Veterinary Medical Association, the Department of Agriculture and others. Similar legislation, H.B. 339, was introduced by Del. Barbara Frush, D-Prince George’s County.
- House Bill 227/Senate Bill 115, sponsored by Del. Jeff Waldstreicher, D-Montgomery County and Sen. James Robey, D-Howard County, which will allow courts to prohibit someone convicted of animal cruelty from owning animals as a term of probation. A recent rash of horrific cruelty cases in Maryland has illustrated the need for stronger animal cruelty laws. Twenty-five states and the District of Columbia have laws prohibiting, or allowing courts to prohibit convicted animal abusers from owning animals for a certain period of time. This legislation would be a small first step towards protecting Maryland’s animals and communities.
- House Bill 407/Senate Bill 747, sponsored by Del. Susan McComas, R-Harford County, and Sen. Norman Stone, D-Baltimore County, which allows courts to include protections for pets in domestic violence protective orders. Research has repeatedly shown a link between animal abuse and domestic violence. Children and animals in the family are often threatened, or actually harmed, as a way to manipulate and coerce others in the family. This legislation will help protect Maryland’s animals and communities.
Source
3 comments:
It's High time something is done for their protection!
Let's see...you're on welfare and get free rent, food, day care, education, electric, & medical care, but you still want a pit bull to parade up and down the sidewalk (and make a little extra cash on the side, fighting the dog on the weekends). You just can't seem to find the money to neuter him. Cool. Let the taxpayers pay for it. Good idea. Perhaps a better idea would be to neuter the welfare recipients.
"neuter the welfare recipients" Best idea I've heard in a long time, Imclain. I wouldn't even complain about my tax dollars being spent on such a worthwhile cause. I'd even gladly pay extra into a "Spay and Neuter Wefare Recipent Fund." I'm totally sick of the way they are multiplying knowing full well they can't even take care of themselves!
Post a Comment