At a recent dinner of the Atlas Economic Research Foundation, Alan Kors, University of Pennsylvania history professor, gave the evening's keynote address. What he revealed about the dereliction and character weakness of academics, intellectuals, media elites and politicians was by no means complimentary-- Professor Kors said that over the years, he has frequently asked students how many deaths were caused by Joseph Stalin and Mao Tsetung and their successors. Routinely, they gave numbers in the thousands. Kors says that's equivalent to saying the Nazis are responsible for the deaths of just a few hundred Jews. But here's the record: Nazis were responsible for the deaths of 20 million of their own people and those in nations they conquered. Between 1917 and 1983, Stalin and his successors murdered, or were otherwise responsible for the deaths of, 62 million of their own people. Between 1949 and 1987, Mao Tsetung and his successors were responsible for the deaths of 76 million Chinese.
Professor Kors asks why are the horrors of Nazism so well known and widely condemned, but not those of socialism and communism? For decades after World War II, people have hunted down and sought punishment for Nazi murderers. How much hunting down and seeking punishment for Stalinist and Maoist murderers? In Europe, especially Germany, hoisting the swastika-emblazoned Nazi flag is a crime. It's acceptable to hoist and march under a flag emblazoned with the former USSR's hammer and sickle. Even in the U.S., it's acceptable to praise mass murderers, as Anita Dunn, President Obama's communications director, did in a commencement address for St. Andrews Episcopal High School at Washington National Cathedral where she said Mao Tsetung was one of her heroes. Whether it's the academic community, the media elite or politicians, there is a great tolerance for the ideas of socialism -- a system that has caused more deaths and human misery than all other systems combined.
Professor Kors did not say this but the reason why the world's leftists give the world's most horrible murderers a pass is because they sympathize with their socioeconomic goals, which include government ownership and/or control over the means of production. In the U.S., the call is for government control, through regulations, as opposed to ownership. Unfortunately, it matters little whether there is a Democratically or Republican-controlled Congress and White House; the march toward greater government control continues. It just happens at a quicker pace with Democrats in charge.
More from Dr. Walter Williams..
3 comments:
Of course Professor Kors did not say that because this use of what he did present is one of the most intellectually dishonest pieces done in recent memory.
Try this on for an answer:
Neither Stalin nor Mao started a World War. Hitler did.
There are many other reasons, but trying to apply a 21st century right wing slant to 30 years of events in the first half of the 20th century is one of the most absurd things I have seen.
History Man
You miss (or are trying to obscure) the point "historyman".
MILLIONS of people have been killed by these 'leaders' and their successors.
Most younger people today don't know anything about who these people were or what they were like-- and that's intentional.
It doesn't have anything to do with starting a war.
If you've ever seen photos from Tiananmen square, you will never forget it.
Human roadkill.
Amen 5:05.
History Man would be more sympathetic if one of the victims were his relative.
Post a Comment