Attention

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not represent our advertisers

Friday, January 02, 2009

Revenue Cap Verses Tax Cap Concept

The following commentary is a repeat of a previous submission that was published on SBYnews.

I would not ordinarily publish a repetition so soon but because our Elected County Executive spoke about his disdain for our Revenue Cap in his recent State of The County Speech I wanted to take this opportunity to reinforce what otherwise might have been forgotton by our citizenry.

Please bare-in-mind that the School Teachers have proposed legislation for the past three legislative sessions to exempt themselves from paying any real estate tax on their own primary homes while increasing the real estate taxes on ordinary citizens.
Read the House Bill for yourself as I'm not making this stuff up folks.
Re: HB 965 - Property Tax Public School Teachers

Several years ago (1978) Talbot County instituted a TAX CAP after a similar hugely unacceptable tax increase to Wicomico County incensed the voters to action. From 1978 until 1995 ballot questions were put before the voters to remove the TAX CAP. Finally, in January of 1995 a Coalition of SPECIAL INTEREST GROUPS - Board of Education, Chamber of Commerce, PTA, NAACP, League of Women Voters, and other individuals SUED to overturn the TAX CAP and they won! The TAX CAP was ruled unconstitional.

Do you think VOICE should have gone for a TAX CAP? That certainly would have been an easy 'kneejerk' thing to do in light of the Court's decision.

After the TAX CAP was ruled unconstitutional in January 1995, The Talbot County Council in May raised the property tax by 46.%. That's right they raised the property taxes by almost 50 percent! But they - SPECIAL INTEREST - didn't have enough! The next year, in 1996 they raised it another 46.3%!!! And we - Wicomico Residents- think 23.7% is bad. Now let's try and add this up. . . .what's 46.1% and 46.3% over two years. Let's hold the math until the end of this lesson.

The Talbot voters were so incensed they searched for a way to stop these run-a-way politicos and came up with the Revenue Cap concept. The voters rallied to get it on the ballot and it was passed in 1996 by 72.21% of the voters! It stands as law today in that County. Even after MANY attempts to have it removed . . VOICE used the EXACT wording in their petition as was used in Talbot County. It's exactly the same language that is LAW in Talbot now.

So what have we learned today. Hopefully we've learned that from the time a TAX CAP was ruled unconstitutional and was replaced by a REVENUE CAP in Talbot County (1995 - 1996) - property taxes went up 92.4%!!! Actually that would not be entirely accurate as I'm told that before the REVENUE CAP could become law the actual true tax increase was 113.8%

The next question is a bit more subjective - after this current events history lesson - is the Daily Times staunch reason for objecting to the REVENUE CAP . . . do you now feel the VOICE proposals are obviously not well thought out?"

If your property tax increased by 113.8%, would the difference be greater or less than your recent pay raise?

"THOSE WHO IGNORE HISTORY ARE DESTINED TO REPEAT IT"




4 comments:

Anonymous said...

It's similar to the reaction to the proposed law to stop erection of more billboards a few years ago. The proposal in itself sparked a rush of new billboards along all highway corridors so they would be grandfathered in had the measure passed.

Anonymous said...

Heck, I hope they never do away with the Revenue Cap.

With the way things are going around here, it would be suicide for the average homeowner to try and do away with the Revenue Cap.

I hope it is here to stay.

Anonymous said...

Hell no to the end of Revenue cap Joe.

We are the highest taxed county on the eastern shore are we not ? How long before we say F--- you and your stinking taxes.

What ? Are they gonna lock us all up ? What have they done for us lately ? It a crzy world of politics and we need to give them some much needed medicine.

Anonymous said...

no one's salary increases are comparable to the tax increases recently enacted, save for the increases the legislators vote for themselves.