Pet ordinance
I find it strange that anyone would want to limit the number of people occupying a house, but not the number of pets. Limiting the number of pets in an urban setting with houses so close to each other is a good idea. Just as a house can have too many people living in it, a house can also have too many animals. Are we getting hung up on the number or is it that people don't want the government telling them what they can do?
I think it is commendable that the police chief wants to work on the number of animals a person can own in the city. I'd like the Humane Society to take on limiting the number of people who can hang out on Priscilla Street by the pond. That would be a good trade-off.
OK PEOPLE,
Let's get this perfectly straight one last time. The 5 animal limit has always been on the books in Salisbury! The Chief was only a puppet for the Mayor as she was trying to pick on one family and her powers are next to nothing any more because of the Blog Sites destroying her. It was dropped because we exposed her game and before she came off looking like a complete mental case, she backed down and dropped the entire thing. It was stated before, all anyone had to do was look up how many families had a special permit for additional animals and it would expose who the Mayor was trying to screw, game over! Nevertheless, let this sink into your heads, there has always been a 5 animal limit in the City of Salisbury.
Now if I were sending in a message about the Zoo the Daily Times would consider it, possibly print it and then come back with a correction after my message. Something like, Jennifer Albero is suing the Salisbury Zoo and her father is Art Goetz. Obviously the Daily Times Staff is so brain dead that they allowed two more messages to be printed without correction because they want everyone to "think" the Chief wasn't doing anything wrong. Proof again that this Newspaper is absolutely run and controlled by the Mayor of Salisbury. Each comment should have clearly stated, this law of 5 animals per household has always been in effect in Salisbury. Joe Carmean and Greg Bassett are looking for cleansers that will take the brown off their noses, any suggestions?
DelMarVa's Premier Source for News, Opinion, Analysis, and Human Interest Contact Publisher Joe Albero at alberobutzo@wmconnect.com or 410-430-5349
2 comments:
I don't know where you got that information but I never stated that. I said at one point we were waiting for the subdivision but nothing ever came to a halt. A reader had suggested nothing was being done there and they too were 100% blind because it was extremely evident things were under way in the renovation department.
It is my understanding, (as of last night) that they should be completely under roof by the end of next week and internal build outs will also be completed. So the Pittsville Firehouse Station 7 is on a roll and the good people of Pittsville are in fact allowing the project to move forward and always have. So once again, I have no clue where you got your information but it was wrong. Oh, the trailer was demolished and removed as well so everything is a go now.
I'm not going to waste my breath on this one. My point was exactly correct. There is a 5 animal limit unless you get a permit and that was my point. Read the grapevine messages and they simply SUGGEST that there was no limit before and the Daily Times KNEW THIS to be a fact. No corrections and they admitted these messages knowing they were 100% incorrect anyway. Nevertheless, thanks for the more technical information.
Post a Comment