Attention

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not represent our advertisers

Sunday, May 06, 2018

I Can't Believe Julie Brewington Is Still Running For County Council


This is exactly what's wrong with politics today. Break laws, get found GUILTY and then continue to run for a political position as if nothing ever happened. 

What's even worse is how Julie Brewington is in such denial. She LIED to the Central Committee by claiming she was not drunk. She went on Facebook in complete denial, passing blame off to law enforcement, as if she was set up. She then claimed she was never in an accident. I know for a fact she drove right into a major ditch and had to climb out a window to get out of her car. 

The above image was just taken yesterday whereas Julie is openly running for office. This woman should be ashamed. She might have had a chance before her DUI arrest against John Cannon but at this point she will, (once again) lose miserably because she's a LIAR. The voting public will not tolerate it. 

This may work for LIBERALS but conservatives will not have anything to do with liars. Julie screwed her party once again. She has no shame.

48 comments:

Anonymous said...

well is she ran as a democrat they would love her!

Anonymous said...

Those two pictures are a perfect example of the saying "Putting lipstick on a pig..."

Anonymous said...

So what happened to the video?

Anonymous said...

The sad part about this situation is 54% of our population consist of the same people like this woman. They are criminals and drunks. They will vote for this trash . This holds true for politics all the way to the top , look at democrats and shake your head.

Anonymous said...

Let's hope the voting residents see thru her lies and vote accordingly. Sad part is people like Julie will never think she did anything wrong and the defense will continue to be "somebody set her up". No responsibility for HER own actions.
I know I wouldn't want her representing me!

Anonymous said...

I think once the name is on the ballot, it can’t be removed.

Anonymous said...

The problem with Julie. She doesn't see that she has done anything wrong. She has been playing the victim from day one. Joe as you know personally Julie does not back off, yet she blames the other person. Always the victim. Hell look at her facebook page she has already changed her story from the beginning. Julie doesn't know when to shut up and sit down. It's everybodies fault but mine. Julie needs some serious help! I personally will not vote for her. Sad to because of the other options.

Anonymous said...

Leaving the race would imply guilt, plus losing out on a lot of free dinners and drinks.

Anonymous said...

People like that (by "like that" i mean the dregs of society) have no shame. Julie is a drunk, a liar, and most likely bipolar. Politics has been handed over to the lowest level of our society. Just look at our former mayors and our current mayor and the city council. Julie is another cog in the corrupt, inept, wheel.

Anonymous said...

I know she may seem as though she is not the best choice but compared to John Cannon or Marc Kilmer she is a better republican than either of those guys.

Anonymous said...

9:17 AM Thank you because my vote for her would be a vote against John and Marc and thats the biggest tragedy of this issue.

8:37 AM If you had a clue most of the already serving elected officials are the dregs of society. You know nothing about these peoples personal lives or business lives and if you did - would be ashamed that these dregs are put on a pedestal as if they are any better than anyone else living. It a frickin' charade. They are liar, thieves, drunks, and criminals.

Anonymous said...

yea, conservatives don't lie. ha! that s funny. both sides lie, bug and bold.

Anonymous said...

Is a DUI a dis qualifier for public office ?

Anonymous said...

I would agree with you that she is better then some that are running...but if she would only stop the drinking and being stupid...that's not going to happen. She loves the attention to much. even negative attention is better then no attention. She has major issues...i hope she seeks help.

Anonymous said...

Looks like I may just skip the voting this time around, Lesser of the Evils is a stretch.

Anonymous said...

8:32 As much as there are free events most of the events are not free...you have to pay for ticket which gives you food. Most of the time alcohol is separate. If alcohol is even served. Some of the tickets are rather pricey for most of us.

Anonymous said...

Looks alot better in that photo.

Anonymous said...

She will not go away. It is becoming awkward especially when you have to attend an event and she is there. Painful to watch.

Anonymous said...

WHY is the, so called, leadership of the local Republican Party putting up with this??? This is the reason I will NOT get involved. They can't be too bright.

Anonymous said...

It will be on PAC 14 wait until you see how sad she was (or at least she kept saying she was) and she totally back peddled on the Winder sign after flag waving with JT now it is "dividing us" and needs to go.

Anonymous said...

She made a mistake. I’m still voting for her.

Anonymous said...

Why is it okay for Trump to select and support felons then. Please tell me?

Anonymous said...

Julie showed bad judgement back in 2008 when she let a convicted sex offender take care of her little girls at the Republican Headquarters.This is just another example of her bad judgement.

Anonymous said...

ahhh a female narcissist. She fits in so well around here with all the male narcissists leading our City/County. The audacity she has to throw on a silk scarf to appear Mary Poppins like is as appalling as she and her choices are. To think that she would have any position of authority sickens me. I wonder if thats really water in her bottle? At least she wore a tanktop under her low cut dress this time

Anonymous said...

Anonymous said...
WHY is the, so called, leadership of the local Republican Party putting up with this??? This is the reason I will NOT get involved. They can't be too bright.

May 4, 2018 at 11:25 AM

Ask Mark McIver why? He won't do a thing except play on his boats. The whole leadership has to change because they have their own agendas.With the guilty plea I am hoping the Central Committee can do something but because she was in fact elected what can they do?

Anonymous said...

I'll vote for her.

Anonymous said...

hell Marc McIver is not around enough to know whats going on. well that's not exactly true. For the last 3 years he has not been around but Since the primaries are coming up he has actually been showing up. Soon as the election are over in June he will disappear again. Anybody would be a fool to vote for him.

Anonymous said...

The only thing Marc McIver cares about is the curly haired chicken opposer.

Anonymous said...

If that were true, Capitol Hill would be deserted.

Anonymous said...

Because every member of the Republican committee is a staunch Democrat.

Anonymous said...

Not a good Republican candidate in this area.

Anonymous said...

Yes i agree no one except those involved even know what central committee does. That being said do not vote for Mark Mciver or his new puppets Wendy Anspacher or James Jester. They are pawns . I know and you know it MARK

Anonymous said...

oh yeah Mark McIver tried to stack the deck to protect his position as Chair person of the Committee. Wendy Anspacher and Jim Jester and 1 more are all products of that. Most people vote to the count of 9 or alphabetical order if they don't know the candidates. Don't do it. McIver recruited those few with low alphabet letters so they get elected. Don't do it..Dont vote for him nor them. Changes are needed and they wont let that happen. Want change? Then don't vote for the incumbents. or those 3 for Central Committee.

Anonymous said...

for the love of God and all that is holy. Most people have no idea what the central committee is but DO NOT VOTE MARK McivER WENDY ANSPACHER OR JAMES JESTER.

Anonymous said...

Reading comprehension seems to be a challenge for you. First, you incorrectly state that I know nothing about the personal or business lives of these people. In point of fact, I know a great deal about many of them. Second, I already indicated many of them are on the low end of the morality scale. Im not clear on the point you were attempting to make. Perhaps you're one of those keyboard warriors spoiling for an argument. In the future, you would be better served forming a coherent thought first. Personally, i find the idea of still voting for this moral reprobate ludicrous. She doesn't get my vote for a human being, let alone public office.

Anonymous said...

Proof positive that even morons are still permitted to vote in America.

Anonymous said...

I agree. We aren't democrats like the ones who completely ignored Day's criminal record and yes he is a criminal because when you ignore or think you are above the law so many times like Day did you are nothing but a common criminal because you believe the law wasn't intended for you.

Anonymous said...

Exactly!! The current president is a shining example of that statement.

Anonymous said...

Just hold that video until the time is right Joe.

Anonymous said...

11:00 Am can you give us some examples of that of our President? Show of what laws he has broken? We want to see what you have that nobody else has.

Anonymous said...

Never said he broke any laws, although I have no doubt he has over the years with his shady real estate deals. My point was, allow a moron to vote and you get a moron in office.
Do you understand now or do I need to send you the large print version with pictures in crayon?

Anonymous said...

Anonymous said...
Exactly!! The current president is a shining example of that statement.

May 6, 2018 at 11:00 AM

Said the Douche Bag Democrat that drooled over the illegal Muslim from Kenya.

Anonymous said...

Anonymous said...
Never said he broke any laws, although I have no doubt he has over the years with his shady real estate deals. My point was, allow a moron to vote and you get a moron in office.
Do you understand now or do I need to send you the large print version with pictures in crayon?

May 6, 2018 at 6:11 PM

He is more of a human than your HOMO Obama ever was! At least he is an American and people respect him.

Anonymous said...

Dam, big difference when she cleans up, bet it's all powdered ready for action!

Anonymous said...

ANOTHER SHOOTING IN SALISBURY

May 7, 2018 @ 2:40 AM

It's 2:40 AM and Station 1 and Paramedic 1 is being dispatched for a shooting at 218 Hall Drive. Reported that SPD is on the scene and the scene is secure

Paramedic 1 advises Responding at 2:41 AM

Truck 2 advises Responding at 2:43 AM

Central tells Paramedic A-1 to Contact the office public service please(don't know what the secret is that they can't say it over the air.)

Another shooting in Salisbury. I guess Jake Day is going to have this one classified as an "Assault" again. Can't have the Foke Festivus Peoples find out that Salisbury is the most crime-ridden small town in the Country.

Paramedic 1 advises on location at 2:47 AM.

Truck 1 advises on location 121 A has command at 2:47 AM

Took them long enough to get there and Paramedic 1 had a 2-minute jump on the Truck with the sleepy head Firemen. What's up with that?

Hall Drive Command advises to Central under Control. Central advise PRMC that we have a 6-year-old trauma Priority 1 @ 2:56 AM. Sounds like he said 6 year old? WTH is up with a 6-year-old getting shot?

Paramedic A-1 advises Transporting and upgrading staffing to 4 at 3:00 AM. Thirteen minutes on scene with a shooting is extremely way too long. If they have 4 people in that ambulance there is no reason that one person could drive and the other 3 work on the patient. They aren't doing surgery so there isn't any reason this wasn't a Load and Go scenario. That is basic trauma life support. Stay and play isn't an option when you have a shooting, especially if it is a 6-year-old. The only treatment required is a backboard, oxygen, IV, and attach to the heart monitor. Why couldn't they do that en route to the hospital and allow that patient to have at least 5 more minutes for real doctors to save the patients life?

Hall Drive Command advises Truck 1 is en route to the hospital unavailable at 3:02 AM

Paramedic A-1 advises they are arriving at PRMC at 3:05 AM. That was a 5 minute ETA to the hospital.

Truck 1 advises they are arriving at PRMC at 3:05 AM. That was a 3 minute ETA to the hospital.

Paramedic 1 gets to the hospital in 5 minutes and Truck 1 gets there in 3 minutes?? WTH is up with that?? Truck 1 is supposed to drive to the hospital without lights and siren and follow all rules of the road. Paramedic 1 is required to respond to the hospital with lights and siren because it is a priority 1 patient and it takes them 5 minutes and Truck 1 gets to the hospital in 3 minutes and they should have been driving the speed limit?? Those are the facts, ladies and gentleman. I am working at another station and wide awake and documenting this call. Something is wrong with this picture!!

This is why Salisbury needs another Fire Chief that has real EMS experience. Maybe it's time to hire outside the department again!

Anonymous said...

ANOTHER SHOOTING IN SALISBURY

May 7, 2018 @ 2:40 AM

It's 2:40 AM and Station 1 and Paramedic 1 is being dispatched for a shooting at 218 Hall Drive. Reported that SPD is on the scene and the scene is secure

Paramedic 1 advises Responding at 2:41 AM

Truck 2 advises Responding at 2:43 AM

Central tells Paramedic A-1 to Contact the office public service please(don't know what the secret is that they can't say it over the air.)

Another shooting in Salisbury. I guess Jake Day is going to have this one classified as an "Assault" again. Can't have the Foke Festivus Peoples find out that Salisbury is the most crime-ridden small town in the Country.

Paramedic 1 advises on location at 2:47 AM.

Truck 1 advises on location 121 A has command at 2:47 AM

Took them long enough to get there and Paramedic 1 had a 2-minute jump on the Truck with the sleepy head Firemen. What's up with that?

Hall Drive Command advises to Central under Control. Central advise PRMC that we have a 6-year-old trauma Priority 1 @ 2:56 AM. Sounds like he said 6 year old? WTH is up with a 6-year-old getting shot?

Paramedic A-1 advises Transporting and upgrading staffing to 4 at 3:00 AM. Thirteen minutes on scene with a shooting is extremely way too long. If they have 4 people in that ambulance there is no reason that one person could drive and the other 3 work on the patient. They aren't doing surgery so there isn't any reason this wasn't a Load and Go scenario. That is basic trauma life support. Stay and play isn't an option when you have a shooting, especially if it is a 6-year-old. The only treatment required is a backboard, oxygen, IV, and attach to the heart monitor. Why couldn't they do that en route to the hospital and allow that patient to have at least 5 more minutes for real doctors to save the patients life?

Hall Drive Command advises Truck 1 is en route to the hospital unavailable at 3:02 AM

Paramedic A-1 advises they are arriving at PRMC at 3:05 AM. That was a 5 minute ETA to the hospital.

Truck 1 advises they are arriving at PRMC at 3:05 AM. That was a 3 minute ETA to the hospital.

Paramedic 1 gets to the hospital in 5 minutes and Truck 1 gets there in 3 minutes?? WTH is up with that?? Truck 1 is supposed to drive to the hospital without lights and siren and follow all rules of the road. Paramedic 1 is required to respond to the hospital with lights and siren because it is a priority 1 patient and it takes them 5 minutes and Truck 1 gets to the hospital in 3 minutes and they should have been driving the speed limit?? Those are the facts, ladies and gentleman. I am working at another station and wide awake and documenting this call. Something is wrong with this picture!!

This is why Salisbury needs another Fire Chief that has real EMS experience. Maybe it's time to hire outside the department again!

Anonymous said...

You'd have to be a desperate MF to want any of that

Anonymous said...

Calm down. She's married. Her sexual appeal is none of your concern.