The AR-15 is not protected by the Second Amendment, according to a federal court ruling Friday.
In his decision in Worman v. Baker, U.S. District Court Judge William G. Young declared, “Assault weapons and LCMs [large capacity magazines] are not within the scope of the personal right to ‘bear arms’ under the Second Amendment.” Furthermore, he argued, “Because the undisputed facts convincingly demonstrate AR-15s and LCMs are most useful in military service, they are beyond the scope of the Second Amendment … and may be banned.”
He insisted, “The test is not the AR-15’s present day popularity but whether it is a weapon ‘most useful in military service.’”
You know what else was “most useful in military service”? The single-shot musket, at the time the Bill of Rights was crafted. It’s pathetically laughable to assert that the Founders meant what Young contends. Quite the contrary, the usefulness and popularity of the AR-15 mean that it is the epitome of what the Founders intended to protect.
More
DelMarVa's Premier Source for News, Opinion, Analysis, and Human Interest Contact Publisher Joe Albero at alberobutzo@wmconnect.com or 410-430-5349
7 comments:
No branch of our military uses an AR-15. Not one.
No branch of any military in the world uses an AR-15.
Dave T: How on earth did this kook become a judge when he cannot even properly interpret the constitution? His argument centers around "his" interpretation which is completely political.
off with the judge's head...
BUY GUNS AND AMMO.
Learn how to hit what you shoot at and be ready for some action.
These people will not stop.
The government will disarm the population.
It is simply a "must do".
I agree
local bully Sherrif Little Lewis, will kiss Hogans ass and take your guns away
Post a Comment